Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:39:29.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bilateralism and Multilateralism in International Migration Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Jürgen Bast*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg. The author may be reached at: , jbast@mpil.de

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Labor and Migration in International Law: Challenges of Protection, Specialization, and Bilateralism
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See generally Panizzon, Marion, Bilateral Migration Agreements and the Gats: Sharing Responsibility Versus Reciprocity, 5 J. Migration & Refugee Issues 70 (2009)Google Scholar.

2 For a detailed version of the argument, see JüRgen Bast, Aufenthaltsrecht Und Migrationssteuerung 67-116 (2011).

3 Case C-192/89, Judgment of 20 September 1990, S. Z. Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie, [1990] European Court Reports 1-3461.

4 Agreement Establishing an Association Between the European Economic Community and Turkey, [1964] Official Journal 217/3687.

5 Cf. Łazkowski, Adam, Enhanced Multilateralism and Enhanced Bilateralism, 45 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 1433 (2008)Google Scholar.

6 See Martenczuk, Bernd, Decisions of Bodies Established by International Agreements and the Community Legal Order, in the European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord Or Harmony? 141 (Kronenberger, Vincent ed., 2001)Google Scholar.

7 See Paulus, Andreas, Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Wolfram, Rüdiger eds., online edition)Google Scholar.

8 Cf. Stephan W. Schill, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (2009).

9 For a contemporary voice, see Alfred Von Overbeck, Niederlassungsfreiheit Und Ausweisungsrecht 86-89 (1907).

10 Worster, William T., Conflicts Between United States Immigration Law and the General Agreement on Trade in Services, 42 Texas Int’l L.J. 55, 64 (2006)Google Scholar.

11 See Carzaniga, Antonia, The Gats, Mode 4, and Pattern of Commitments, in Moving People to Deliver Services 21 (Mattoo, Aaditya & Carzaniga, Antonia eds., 2003)Google Scholar.

12 Bast, Jürgen, Annex on Movement of Natural Persons, in Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, WTO-Trade in Services 591 (Wolfram, Rüdiger et al. eds., 2008)Google Scholar.