Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:40:36.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching International Law to Political Science Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

M. J. Peterson
M. J. Peterson*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Teaching International Relations and International Organizations in International Law Courses: Constructing the State-of-the-Art International Law Course
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 87 , 1993 , pp. 411 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Liberal” here follows the definition of Anne-Marie Slaughter Burley in Law and the Liberal Paradigm in International Relations Theory, 86 Asil Proc. 180 (1992).

2 A term denoting a society of states, not a global society of individuals. Leading expositions include Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bull, Hedley & Watson, Adam (Eds.), The Expansion of International Society (1984)Google Scholar; Mayall, James, Nationalism and International Society (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Nardin, Terry, Law, Morality, and the Relations of States (1983)Google Scholar; Kratochwil, Friedrich, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Onuf, Nicholas, World of our Making (1989)Google Scholar.

4 See, e.g., Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Co-Operation and Discord in the World Political Economy (1984)Google Scholar; Oye, Kenneth A. (Ed.) Cooperation Under Anarchy (1986)Google Scholar; Young, Oran R., International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment (1989)Google Scholar; Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O., and Levy, Marc A. (Eds.) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (1993)Google Scholar. The journal International Organization publishes many article-length studies of international regimes.

5 Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, 36 Intl Org. 186 (1982)Google Scholar.

6 A term used in game theory and collective-choice literature to denote situations in which the outcome cannot be determined by any one participant but depends on the aggregate of choices made by participants acting individually though aware of their enmeshment in a common situation.

7 See remarks of Kenneth Abbott, proposing a joint discipline, and of Oran Young, pointing out the obstacles, in panel on International Law and International Relations Theory: Building Bridges, 86 Asil Proc. 167(1992).