Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T01:59:51.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Xue Hanqin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Xue Hanqin*
Affiliation:
Department of Treaty and Law, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China;

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The State of State Responsibility
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The earlier version of this article reads to the effect that if the right infringed by the act of a state arises from a multilateral treaty or from a rule of customary international law, any other state party would be considered an injured state, if it is established that:

(1) the right has been created or is established in its favour; (2) the infringement... necessarily affects the enjoyment of the rights or the performance of the obligations of the other States parties to the multilateral treaty or bound by the rule of customary international law; and (3) the right has been expressly stipulated [as protecting] the collective interests of the States parties.

2 James Crawrord, International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility, Introduction, Text and Commentaries 256 (2002).

3 I.L.C. Commentames, Article 42, para. 2, at 295, in UN Doc. A/56/10 (2001).

4 Id. at Article 48(2).

5 Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co., Ltd., 1970ICJ Rep. 3, 32, at para. 33.

6 Crawford, supra note 2, at 305.

7 Id. at 281-82.