Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-s6gjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-23T13:03:44.201Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Remarks by Vera Gowlland-Debbas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Vera Gowlland-Debbas*
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
The International Court of Justice at 60: Performance and Prospects
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1 Elettronica Sicula, S.p.A. (ELSI) (U.S. v. Italy), 1989 ICJ Rep. 96-97, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Schwebel.

2 See WHO/Egypt Advisory Opinion, 1980 ICJ Rep. 73; Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Article 4 of Charter), Advisory Opinion, 1948 ICJ Rep. 57.

3 Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestian Terrritory, 2004 ICT Rep. 1121.

4 See, e.g., SC Res. 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 478 (1980), and 1322 (2000).

5 Wall Opinion, 2004 ICJ Rep. Dispositif para. 163(3) D.