No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Michael D. Sandler
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Antitrust Implications of Trade Law: Japan, the European Communities, and the United States
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982
References
1 19 U.S.C. § 2501 (Supp. IV 1980) et. seq.
2 United States v. Aluminum Company of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945).
3 374 U.S. 174 (1963).
4 Tariff Act of 1930, § 337, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).
5 19 U.S.C. §§ 2251-53 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).
6 19 U.S.C. § 2131 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980).
7 United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965); Eastern Railroads Presidents Conf. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961).
8 United States v. Container Corp. of America, 393 U.S. 133 (1969).
9 See Interamerican Ref. Corp. v. Texaco Marcaibo, Inc., 307 F. Supp. 1291 (D. Del. 1970).
10 Exchange of letters between Ambassador Okawara and Attorney General Smith, reprinted in [1981] INT'L TRADE REP. U.S. IMPORT WEEKLY (BNA) at M-l.