No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Andreas F. Lowenfeld
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- The U.S./Iranian Hostage Settlement
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1981
References
8 Sniadach V. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 (1969); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1974); Mitchell v. W.T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600 (1974); and North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 (1978).
9 433 U.S. 186 (1977).
10 International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).
11 National Am. Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 448 F.Supp. 622 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
12 Thus the case chosen by Judge Duffy on remand from the Second Circuit, involving advertising contracts made and wholly performed in New York, was an exceptional, and not a typical case. Marschalk Co. v. Iran National Airlines Corp.—F.Supp.—(S.D.N.Y. 6/11/81).
13 N.Y. Civ. Prac. L.R. §6211 (a) (McKinney 1980).
14 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights between the United States and Iran, 8 U.S.T. 899, T.I.A.S. No. 3853, Art. XI, para. 4.
15 Electronic Data Systems Corp., Iran v. The Social Security Organization of the Government of Iran, et. al., 2d Cir., No. 79-7696.
16 New England Merchants National Bank v. Iran Power Generation and Transmission Co., 502 F. Supp. 120 (S.D.N. Y. 1980)
17 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964)