Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:02:36.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Overview: Realism in International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Richard H. Steinberg*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Realism and Legalism
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ratner, Steven R. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., Symposium on Method in International Law, 93 AJIL 291 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Simma, Bruno & Paulus, Andreas, The Responsibility of Individual for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View, 93 AJIL 302 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, e.g., O’Connell, Mary Ellen, New International Legal Process, 93 AJIL 334 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abram Chayes et. al., International Legal Process: M F for an Introductory Course (1968).

4 See, e.g., Harold D. Laswell & Myres S. Mcdougal, Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Society, and Policy (1992).

5 See, e.g., David Kennedy, International legal Structures (1987); Charlesworth, Hillary et. al., Feminist Approaches to International Law, 85 AJIL 613 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See, e.g., Burley, Anne-Marie & Mattli, Walter, Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration, 47 Int’l Org. 41 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See, e.g., Abbott, Kenneth, Modem International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers, 14 Yale J. Int’l L. 335 (1989)Google Scholar.

8 See, e.g., Dunhoff, Jeffrey L. & Trachtman, Joel P., Economic Analysis of International Law, 24 Yale Ј. Int’l L. 1 (1999)Google Scholar.

9 See, e.g., Slaughter, Anne-Marie, International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda, 87 AJIL 205 (1993)Google Scholar; Abbott, Ken, International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts, 93 AJIL 361, 365 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979).

11 Krasner, Stephen D., Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables, in International Regimes 355 (Krasner, Steven D. ed. 1983)Google Scholar.

12 Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Causes and Regime Consequences, in International Regimes 1-22 (Krasner, Stephen D. ed., 1983)Google Scholar.

13 Williamson, Oliver, Transaction Cost Economics, in Handbook of Industrial Organization 135-82 (Schmalensee, R. & Willig, R. D. eds., 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Krasner, supra note 11.

15 Krasner, Stephen D., Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier, 43 World Pol. 336 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gruber, Lloyd, Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (2001)Google Scholar; Steinberg, Richard H., In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargainingand Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, 56(2) Int’l Org. 339-74 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar [hereinafter Consensus-Based Bargaining].

16 Stephen D. Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (1999).

17 Steinberg, Richard H., The Prospects for Partnership: Overcoming Obstacles to Transatlantic Policy Cooperation in Asia, in Partners Or Competitors: the Prospects for U.S.-European Cooperation on Asian Trade 222-23 (Steinberg, Richard H. & Stokes, Bruce eds., 1999)Google Scholar.

18 Consensus-Based Bargaining, supra note 15.

19 Morgenthau, Hans J., Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law, 34 AJIL 260 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Schachter, Oscar, The Role of Power in International Law, 93 ASIL Proc. 200 (1999)Google Scholar; Oscar Schachter, International Law in Theory and Practice (1979).