Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T10:36:08.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report of Committee on Department of State and United Nations Publications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Appendix
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Committee members Cardozo and Nadelmann do not agree with this proposal.

2 The regulations on editorial preparation as revised Oct. 31, 1955 (Manual of Organization, 045.2) read: “The basic documentary diplomatic record to be printed in Foreign Relations of the United States, Diplomatic Papers, shall be edited by the Historical Division of the Department of State. The editing of the record shall be guided by the principles of historical objectivity. There shall be no alteration of the text, no deletions without indicating where in the text the deletion is made, and no omission of facts which were of major importance in reaching a decision. Nothing shall be omitted for the purpose of concealing or glossing over what might be regarded by some as a defect of policy. However, certain omissions of documents or parts of documents are permissible for the following reasons:

“a. To avoid publication of matters which would tend to impede current diplomatic negotiations or other business.

b. To condense the record and avoid repetition of needless details.

c. To preserve the confidence reposed in the Department by individuals and by foreign governments.

d. To avoid giving needless offense to other nationalities or individuals.

e. To eliminate personal opinions presented in despatches and not acted upon by the Department. To this consideration there is one qualification–in connection with major decisions it is desirable, where possible, to show the alternatives presented to the Department before the decision was made.”

3 For report of the committee, see 52 A.J.I.L. 510 (1958).