Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T06:21:12.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Different Perceptions of Agreements and Disagreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Jan F. Triska*
Affiliation:
Stanford University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Second Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In preparation of this paper the author relied heavily on the research materials, experimental papers and published works of Professor Eobert C. North, Director, Studies of International Conflict and Integration. Professor Richard A. Brody, Assistant Director, offered valuable comments and suggestions.

2 In Merton, Broom and Cottrell, Sociology Today 279 (New York: Basic Books, 1959).

3 Jan P. Triska and David D. Finley, “Soviet-American Relations: A Multiple Symmetry Model,” Stanford Studies of the Communist System (mimeo., 1964, 32 pp.).

4 1. Iran, 1946; 2. Greece, 1947; 3. Marshall Plan, 1947; 4. Czechoslovakia, 1948; 5. Berlin, 1948; 6. Yugoslavia, 1948; 7. Korea, 1950-; 8. Tibet, 1950-; 9. Taiwan, 1950-; 10. Indo-China (Vietnam), 1950-; 11. East Germany, 1953; 12. NATO, esp. 1955; 13. Poland, 1956; 14. Hungary, 1956; 15. Suez, 1956; 16. Lebanon-Jordan, 1958; 17. Quemoy, 1958; 18. Berlin, 1958-1959; 19. Tibet, 1959; 20. Laos, 1959-; 21. U-2, 1960; 22. The Congo, 1960; 23. Bay of Pigs, 1961; 24. The Berlin Wall, 1961; 25. Albania, 1961; 26. Finland, 1961; 27. India (China), 1962; 28. U. 8. (Cuba), 1962; and 29. China, 1963.

5 « ‘ ‘ Soviet Eisk-Taking Behavior,'’ Stanford Studies of the Communist System, in progress.