Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:58:48.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Confiscation of Alien Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Clement L. Bouvé
Clement L. Bouvé*
Affiliation:
Of the Bar of the District of Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
First Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 20 , 1926 , pp. 14 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Secret Journals of the Acts and Proceedings of Congress, Vol. 3, p. 484.

2 Borchard, “Enemy private property,” A. J. I. L., No. 3, July, 1924.

3 (1796), 3 Dallas, 199.

4 (1814), 8 Cranch, 110.

5 Int. Law Dig., Vol. III, p. 250.

6 Int. Law Dig., Vol. VII, p. 313.

7 Moore, Int. Law Dig., Vol. VII, p. 313.

8 (1899), 175 U. S. 677.

9 Moore, Int. Law Dig., Vol. VII, p. 291, citing Oakes v. United States, 174 U. S. 788.

10 Young v. United States, 97 Wall. 39, 60.

11 Scott, Hague Conferences, Vol. II, of 1907, p. 757.

12 Scott, op. cit., 1899 Conf., p. 488.

13 Scott, Hague Peace Conferences, American Instructions and Reports, p. 9.

14 Annex to minutes of meeting of July 5, Scott, Hague Conferences, Conference of 1899, DD. 414, 428.

15 International Law, 1912 ed., Vol. II, p. 139.

16 Vol. I, pp. 86–101.

17 H. Rep. 85, 65th Cong. 1st Session.

18 65th Cong. 1st Session, H. R. 4960, 131–132.

19 H. Rep. 85, 65th Cong. 1st Session.

20 S. Rep. Nos. 111 and 113, 65th Cong. 1st Session.

21 31 Op. Atty. Gen. 463.

22 See H. Rep. 1089, June 2, 1920, 66th Cong. 2nd Session.

23 Congressional Record, Vol. 59, part 8, pp. 8429–8475.

24 267 U. S. 42.

25 Banco Mexicano, etc. v. Miller, et al, Court of Appeals, D. C., 1922, 289 Fed. 924.

26 Stoehr v. Miller, U. S. D. C., S. D. N. Y., 1923.

27 269 Fed. 827.

28 In Kahn v. Garvin, 263 Fed. 909, 916, 1920.

29 In re Gregg’s Estate, Penna. Sup. Ct. 1920, 266 Pa. 189.

30 Sup. Ct. King’s County, N. Y., 106 N. Y. Misc. 545.

31 Techt v. Hughes, N. Y. Ct. App. 1920, 229 N. Y. 222.

32 Littlejohn & Co. v. U. S., Adv. Opinions Sup. Ct., Mar. 15, 1926, p. 207.

33 Scott, Hague Peace Conferences, American Instructions and Reports, pp. 107–109.

34 See Miller v. Ship Resolution, 2 Dallas 1, 4 (1781); The Scotia, 14 Wall. U. S. 170, 187, (1871); The Paquete Habana, 175 U. S. 677, 711 (1900); The Antelope, 10 Wheat. U. S. (1825), 66, 122.

35 8 Cranch, 125.

36 Dissenting opinion in Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 268, 315, 316.

37 See J. Whitla Stinson, “Title to German Ships Seized by the United States during the World War,” Univ. of Penna. Law Review, November, 1923; and “International Sanctions and American Law,” A. .T. I. L., Vol. XIX, No. 3, July 1925.

38 Stinson, International Sanctions, etc., supra, citing U. S. v. Clarke, 8 Peters (1834), 436; see Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. U. S. (1817), 259, 269, 272, 277; Carnal v. Bank, 10 Wheat. U. S. (1825), 18.

39 MacLeod v. United States, 229 U. S. 414, 434.