Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:15:21.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative morbidity data in primary care – the Northumberland MEDICS Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Richard Edwards
Affiliation:
Evidence for Population Health Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Paul Murphy
Affiliation:
Northumberland Health Authority, Morpeth, UK
Kevin J Allan
Affiliation:
Northumberland Health Authority, Morpeth, UK
Sue Gordon
Affiliation:
Northumberland Health Authority, Morpeth, UK
Stephen Singleton
Affiliation:
Northumberland Health Authority, Morpeth, UK Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is increasing interest in collecting morbidity data from general practice. We describe our experience from Northumberland MEDICS, one of the first morbidity data collection projects in the UK. All Northumberland practices were invited to participate. Data were initially collected every 3–6 months and included the prevalence of chronic diseases, disability in the over 75s, and recording of health markers, such as smoking status. Thirty-three out of 52 practices participated. There was marked variation in prevalences and recording of health markers between practices. Recorded prevalence of hypertension and diabetes increased steadily from 1994 to 1998. Outcomes, judged by the original objectives, were mixed. However, as the project evolved, evidence emerged that MEDICS was contributing to a culture in which the use of data from practice clinical systems to improve patient care has become a core objective. Key lessons from our experience include appreciating: the importance of data quality and minimising workload for practices; the difficulties practices face in recording morbidity data consistently and systematically; the limitations of GP morbidity data for health needs assessment and commissioning at district level; and the need to focus on providing useful and relevant data for individual practices. MEDICS now covers all 53 Northumberland practices. The project focuses on recording and analysing data to help practices improve structured patient care. Increasingly data collection in general practice in Northumberland is seen as a core activity with the current dataset linking closely with local priorities and reflecting national initiatives such as Clinical Governance and National Service Frameworks.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 Arnold