Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:41:19.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unsuccessful, Unwanted, and Unwarranted Resuscitation: Exploring Ambulance Personnel Preparation and Support for Death in the Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

Natalie Anderson
Affiliation:
University Of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Auckland Emergency Department, Auckland, New Zealand
Julia Slark
Affiliation:
University Of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Merryn Gott
Affiliation:
University Of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

In many countries, ambulance personnel are authorized to start or stop resuscitation efforts in accordance with clinical guidelines. Research shows that decisions to withhold or terminate resuscitation and manage patient death scenes can be particularly challenging.

Aim:

To identify preparation and support mechanisms for ambulance personnel who are authorized to withhold or terminate resuscitation efforts, and manage patient death in the field.

Methods: A scoping review provided an overview of international research in this area. A qualitative exploratory study was then undertaken. Focus groups were held with senior ambulance personnel currently working in clinical education, managerial, or pastoral support roles across New Zealand.

Results:

Well-supported clinical experiential learning and resolved personal experiences with grief and death were considered most useful to increase self-efficacy and coping with patient death. Participants felt some of the personal and interpersonal skills needed to manage death in the field were difficult to teach. Relatively little time is spent preparing ambulance personnel for the non-technical skills associated with resuscitation decision-making, particularly communicating with family and bystanders. Ambulance personnel responses and support-needs during or after the event are idiosyncratic. Ambulance personnel appear to primarily rely on colleagues and managers checking in and offering informal debriefing.

Discussion:

Results from this study identify opportunities for improvement in the preparation and support of ambulance personnel faced with managing patient death in the field. Clinical experience with supportive mentoring may provide the best opportunities for learning, but novices may not get exposure to patient death in this context. Ambulance personnel may benefit from training, which includes opportunities to role-play death notification and communication with family and bystanders at the scene of a patient death. Ambulance employers should allow downtime to facilitate personalized peer and managerial support where needed.

Type
Palliative Care
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019