Skip to main content Accessibility help

Trial to End Ambulance Diversion in Boston: Report from the Conference of the Boston Teaching Hospitals Consortium

  • Franklin D. Friedman (a1), Niels K. Rathlev (a2) (a3), Laura White (a4), Stephen K. Epstein (a5), Assaad Sayah (a6), Mark Pearlmutter (a7), Paul Biddinger (a8), Richard Zane (a9) and Peter Moyer (a10)...


Introduction: Annual ambulance diversion hours in Boston increased more than six-fold from 1997 to 2006. Although interventions and best practices were implemented, there was no reduction in the number of diversion hours.

Objectives: A consortium of Boston teaching hospitals instituted a two-week moratorium on citywide diversion from 02 October 2006 to 15 October 2006. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in measures of hospital and emergency medical services (EMS) efficiency compared with the two weeks immediately prior.

Methods: A total of nine hospitals and the municipal emergency medical services in Boston submitted data for analysis. The following mean daily hospital measures were studied: (1) emergency department volume; (2) number of emergency department admissions; (3) length of stay (LOS) for all patients; and (4) number of elopements. Mean EMS at-hospital time by destination and the percent of all Boston EMS transports to each hospital destination were calculated. The median differences (MD) were calculated as “before” minus “during” the study period and were compared with paired, Wilcoxon, non-parametric tests. Additional mean EMS measures for all destinations included: (1) to hospital time; (2) number of responses with transport initiated per day; (3) incident entry to arrival; and (4) at-hospital time.

Results: The LOS for admitted patients (MD = 0.30 hours; IQR 0.10,1.30; p = 0.03) and number of daily admissions (MD = -1.50 patients; IQR -1.50, -0.10; p = 0.04) were significantly different statistically. The results for LOS for all patients, LOS for discharged patients, ED volume, EMS time at hospital by destination, number of elopements, and percent of Boston EMS transports to each hospital revealed no statistically significant differences. The difference between the study and control periods for mean EMS to hospital time, at-hospital time, and incident entry to arrival was a maximum of 0.6 minutes. The vast majority of EMS respondents to an online survey believed that the “no diversion” policy should be made routine practice.

Conclusions: The LOS for admitted patients decreased by 18 minutes, and the number of admissions increased by 1.5 patients per day during the study period. The “no diversion” policy resulted in minimal changes in EMS efficiency and operations. Diversion was temporarily eliminated in a major city without significant detrimental changes in ED, hospital, or EMS efficiency.


Corresponding author

Correspondence: Niels K. Rathlev, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Baystate Medical Center759 Chestnut St.Springfield, MA 01199 USA E-mail:


Hide All
Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the U.S. Health System: Hospital-based emergency care: At the breaking point, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
Massachusetts Office of Health and Human Services: Uniform Definitions/Rules Governing Ambulance Diversion. 22 April 2002. Available at Accessed 10 June 2009.
Metropolitan Boston Emergency Medical Services Council Annual Reports. 19972006.
Koh, H: Best practice guidelines for hospitals concerning ambulance diversion. 16 December 1999. Available at Accessed 10 June 2009.
Koh, H: Additional measures that hospitals should take regarding ambulance diversion. 11 December 2000. Avaliable at Accessed 10 June 2009.
Friedman, F: Chair, Conference of Boston Teaching Hospitals (COBTH) Emergency Medical Services Committee, personal communication, May 2006.
Rathlev, NK, Chessare, J, Olshaker, J, et al: The probability of ED diversion status as a function of inpatient occupancy. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44(4):S29.
Southern Massachusetts Emergency Medical Services Council. Monthly and Annual Reports, 2005.
Dyer, S: Medical Director of Boston Emergency Medical Services, Police, and Fire, personal communication, June 2009.
Boston University Program for the Management of Variability in Health Care Delivery: Root cause analysis of emergency department crowding and ambulance diversion in Massachusetts. October 2002. Available at Accessed 10 June 2009.
Olshaker, JS, Rathlev, NK: Emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion: the impact and potential solutions of extended boarding of admitted patients in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med 2006;30(3):351356.
Schneider, SM, Gallery, ME, Schafermeyer, R, et al: Emergency department crowding: A point in time. Ann Emerg Med 2003;43:167172.
Burt, CW, McCaig, LF, Valverde, RH: Analysis of ambulance transports and diversions among US emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:317326.
Sun, BC, Mohanty, SA, Weiss, R, et al: Effects of hospital closures and hospital characteristics on emergency department ambulance diversion, Los Angeles County, 1998 to 2004. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:309316.
Begley, CE, Chang, Y, Wood, RC, et al: Emergency department diversion and trauma mortality: evidence from Houston, Texas. J Trauma 2004;57:12601265.
Schull, MJ, Morrison, LJ, Vermeulen, M, et al: Emergency department gridlock and out-of-hospital delays for cardiac patients. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10:709716.
Falvo, T, Grove, L, Stachura, R, et al: The financial impact of ambulance diversions and patient elopements. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:5862.
Handel, DA, McConnell, KJ: The financial impact of ambulance diversion on inpatient hospital revenues and profits. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:2933.
McConnell, KJ, Richards, CF, Dava, M, et al: Ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:702710.
Pham, JC, Patel, R, Millin, MG, et al: The effects of ambulance diversion: A comprehensive review. Acad Emerg Med 2006;11:12201227.
Asplin, BR: Does ambulance diversion matter? Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:477480.

Trial to End Ambulance Diversion in Boston: Report from the Conference of the Boston Teaching Hospitals Consortium

  • Franklin D. Friedman (a1), Niels K. Rathlev (a2) (a3), Laura White (a4), Stephen K. Epstein (a5), Assaad Sayah (a6), Mark Pearlmutter (a7), Paul Biddinger (a8), Richard Zane (a9) and Peter Moyer (a10)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed