Skip to main content Accessibility help

Text Messaging as a Strategy to Address the Limits of Audio-Based Communication During Mass-Gathering Events with High Ambient Noise

  • Adam Lund (a1), Daniel Wong (a1), Kerrie Lewis (a2), Sheila A. Turris (a3), Sean Vaisler (a2) and Samuel Gutman (a1)...



The provision of medical care in environments with high levels of ambient noise (HLAN), such as concerts or sporting events, presents unique communication challenges. Audio transmissions can be incomprehensible to the receivers. Text-based communications may be a valuable primary and/or secondary means of communication in this type of setting.


To evaluate the usability of text-based communications in parallel with standard two-way radio communications during mass-gathering (MG) events in the context of HLAN.


This Canadian study used outcome survey methods to evaluate the performance of communication devices during MG events. Ten standard commercially available handheld smart phones loaded with basic voice and data plans were assigned to health care providers (HCPs) for use as an adjunct to the medical team's typical radio-based communication. Common text messaging and chat platforms were trialed. Both efficacy and provider satisfaction were evaluated.


During a 23-month period, the smart phones were deployed at 17 events with HLAN for a total of 40 event days or approximately 460 hours of active use. Survey responses from health care providers (177) and dispatchers (26) were analyzed. The response rate was unknown due to the method of recruitment. Of the 155 HCP responses to the question measuring difficulty of communication in environments with HLAN, 68.4% agreed that they “occasionally” or “frequently” found it difficult to clearly understand voice communications via two-way radio. Similarly, of the 23 dispatcher responses to the same item, 65.2% of the responses indicated that “occasionally” or “frequently” HLAN negatively affected the ability to communicate clearly with team members. Of the 168 HCP responses to the item assessing whether text-based communication improved the ability to understand and respond to calls when compared to radio alone, 86.3% “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that this was the case. The dispatcher responses (n = 21) to the same item also “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that this was the case 95.5% of the time.


The use of smart phone technology for text-based communications is a practical and feasible tool for MG events and should be explored further. Multiple, reliable, discrete forms of communication technology are pivotal to executing effective on-site medical and disaster responses.

LundA, WongD, LewisK, TurrisSA, VaislerS, GutmanS. Text Messaging as a Strategy to Address the Limits of Audio-Based Communication During Mass-Gathering Events with High Ambient Noise. Prehosp Disaster Med.2013;28(1):1-7.


Corresponding author

Correspondence: Adam Lund, BSc, MD, MDE, FRCPC (Emergency) c/o Royal Columbian Hospital Emergency 330 East Columbia Street New Westminster, BC V3L 3W7 Canada E-mail


Hide All
1.Feldman, MJ, Lukins, JL, Verbeek, RP, MacDonald, RD, Burgess, RJ, Schwartz, B. Half a million strong: the emergency medical services response to a single day, mass-gathering event. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(4):287-296.
2.Larkin, GL. Unwitting partners in death: the ethics of teamwork in disaster management. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics. 2010;12(6):495-501.
3.Public Health Agency of Canada. Public health guidance for the prevention and management of influenza-like-illness (ILI), including the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009: Accessed March 10, 2012.
4.Grange, J. Planning for large events. Cur Sports Med Rep. 2002;1(3):156-161.
5. Desrocher M. Ottawa Bluesfest stage collapse “a freak situation.” Accessed March 10, 2012.
6. Greene A. Cheap Trick demand explanation for near fatal stage collapse. Rolling Stone. August 1, 20122. Accessed March 10, 2012.
7.Associated Press. Five killed, dozens injured as stage collapses at Indiana State Fair. Accessed March 10, 2012.
8. Cole M. Deadly storm strikes Belgium's Pukkelpop festival. Accessed: March 10, 2012.
9.Arbon, P. Mass-gathering medicine: a review of the evidence and future directions for research. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(2):131-135.
10.Goines, L, Hagler, L. Noise pollution: a modern plague. South Med J. 2007;100:287-294.
11.National Institutes of Health. Noise induced hearing loss. Accessed March 10, 2012.
12.National Institute of Health and Safety. Reducing noise hazards for call and dispatch center operators. Accessed March 10, 2012.
13.Motorola. Background noise and radio performance: best practices help firefighters and other first responders maximize the intelligibility of two-way radio communications in high-noise environments. Accessed March 10, 2012.
14. Willcox DO. Radio reception problems: the problem with radio reception in commercial structures. Accessed March 10, 2012.
15.Federal Emergency Management Agency. U.S. Fire Administration: voice radio communications guide for the Fire Service. Accessed March 10, 2012.
16. Furlong J, Keefe DJ. The night the city became a stadium: independent review of the 2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup playoff riot. Accessed March 10, 2012.
17.Garshnek, V, Burkle, FM. Telecommunications systems in support of disaster medicine: applications of basic information pathways. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):213-218.
18.Parrillo, SJ. Medical care at mass gatherings: considerations for physician involvement. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995;10(4):273-275.
19.North West Center for Public Health Practice. Mass gatherings: are you prepared? Accessed March 10, 2012.
20. Tsouros AD, Efstathiou PA. Mass gatherings and public health: the experience of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games. Accessed March 10, 2012.
21. Meredith JT. Mass gathering events: pre-event analysis and the response. American College of Emergency Physicians disaster medicine section newsletter. Accessed March 10, 2012.


Text Messaging as a Strategy to Address the Limits of Audio-Based Communication During Mass-Gathering Events with High Ambient Noise

  • Adam Lund (a1), Daniel Wong (a1), Kerrie Lewis (a2), Sheila A. Turris (a3), Sean Vaisler (a2) and Samuel Gutman (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed