Skip to main content Accessibility help

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Medical Priority Dispatch System in Detecting Cardiac Arrest Emergency Calls in Melbourne

  • Julie Flynn (a1), Frank Archer (a1) and Amee Morgans (a1)



In Australia, cardiac arrest kills 142 out of every 100,000 people each year; with only 3–4% of out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest in Melbourne surviving to hospital discharge. Prompt initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, and advanced cardiac care greatly improves the chances of survival from cardiac arrest. A critical step in survival is identifying by the emergency ambulance dispatcher potential of the probability that the person is in cardiac arrest. The Melbourne Metropolitan Ambulance Service (MAS) uses the computerized call-taking system, Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS), to triage incoming, emergency, requests for ambulance responses. The MPDS is used in many emergency medical systems around the world, however, there is little published evidence of the system's efficacy.


This study attempts to undertake a sensitivity/specificity analysis to determine the ability of MPDS to detect cardiac arrest.


Emergency ambulance dispatch records of all cases identified as suspected cardiac arrest by MPDS were matched with ambulance, patient-care records and records from the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry to determine the number of correctly identified cardiac arrests. Additionally, cases that had cardiac arrests, but were not identified correctly at the point of call-taking, were examined. All data were collected retrospectively for a three-month period (01 January through 31 March 2003).


The sensitivity of MPDS in detecting cardiac arrest was 76.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 73.6%–79.8%) and specificity was 99.2% (95% CI: 99.1–99.3%). These results indicate that cardiac arrests are correctly identified in 76.7% of cases.


Although the system correctly identified 76.7% of cardiac arrest cases, the number of false negatives suggests that there is room for improvement in recognition by MPDS to maximize chances for survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study provides an objective and comprehensive measurement of the accuracy of MPDS cardiac-arrest detection in Melbourne, as well as providing a baseline for comparison with subsequent changes to the MPDS.


Corresponding author

Amee Morgans Research Fellow Centre for Ambulance and Paramedic Studies Monash University PO Box 527 Frankston VIC 3199 Australia


Hide All
1Newman, M: The chain of survival revisited: The emergence of early recognition as the unsung vital link. JEMS 1998;23((5):4656.
2Farand, L, Leprohon, J, Kalina, M, Champagne, F, Contandriopoulos, A, Preker, A: The role of protocols and professional judgement in emergency medical dispatching. Eur J Emerg Med 1995;2((3):136148.
3Clawson, JJ, Martin, RL, Cady, GA, Maio, R: The wake effect: Emergency vehicle-related collisions. Prehosp Disast Med 1997;12((4):274277.
4Maguire, B, Hunting, KL, Smith, GS, Levick, NR: Occupational fatalities in emergency medical services: A hidden crisis. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40((6):625632.
5Anonymous: Ambulance crash-related injuries among emergency medical services workers—United States, 1991-2002. JAMA 2003;289(13):16281629.
6Smith, K, Peeters, A, McNeil, J: Results from the first 12 months of a fire first-responder program in Australia. Resuscitation 2001;49:143150.
7Bernard, S: Outcome from pre-hospital cardiac arrest in Melbourne, Australia. Emerg Med 1998;10:2529.
8Waalewijn, RA, de Vos, R, Koster, RW: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Amsterdam and its surrounding areas: Results from the Amsterdam resuscitation study (ARREST) in ‘Utstein’ style. Resuscitation 1998;38((3):157167.
9Metropolitan Ambulance Service, Metropolitan Ambulance Service Website, Available at Accessed 27 May 2003.
10Wilson, S, Cooke, M, Morrell, R, Bridge, P, Allan, T: A systematic review of the evidence supporting the use of priority dispatch of emergency ambulances. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6((1):4249.
11Bailey, ED, O'Connor, RE, Ross, RW: The use of emergency medical dispatch protocols to reduce the number of inappropriate scene responses made by advanced life support personnel. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000;4((2):186189.
12Holmberg, T, Joyce, S: Appropriateness of EMS response in a priority dispatch system. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32(3):111. Abstract.
13Palumbo, L, Kubincanek, J, Emerman, C., Jouriles, N, Cydulka, R, Shade, B: Performance of a system to determine EMS dispatch priorities. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14((4):388390.
14Slovis, CM, Carruth, TB, Seitz, WJ, Thomas, CM, Elsea, WR. A priority dispatch system for emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14((11):10551060.
15Nicholl, J, Coleman, P, Parry, G, Turner, J, Dixon, S: Emergency priority dispatch systems: A new era in the provision of ambulance services in the UK. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999; 3:7175.
16Garza, AG, Gratton, MC, Chen, JJ, Carlson, B: The accuracy of predicting cardiac arrest by emergency medical services dispatchers: The calling party effect. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10((9):955960.
17FitzGerald, G, Sayre, M, Kazunas, G, Liu, T: Can medical call-takers accurately identify cardiac arrest? Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:387. Abstract.
18Heward, A, Damiani, M, Hartley-Sharpe, C: Does the use of the Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System affect cardiac arrest detection? Emerg Med J 2004;21:115118.


Sensitivity and Specificity of the Medical Priority Dispatch System in Detecting Cardiac Arrest Emergency Calls in Melbourne

  • Julie Flynn (a1), Frank Archer (a1) and Amee Morgans (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed