Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T18:58:52.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationale for Open-Chest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

J.K. Alifimoff ,
K. Stajduhar ,
P. Safar ,
N. Bircher ,
R. Steinberg ,
M. Sotosky ,
P. McNulty  and
W. Stezoski
J.K. Alifimoff
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
K. Stajduhar
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
P. Safar
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
N. Bircher
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
R. Steinberg
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
M. Sotosky
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
P. McNulty
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
W. Stezoski
Affiliation:
Resuscitation Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Presbyterian-University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15260
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Present national and international guidelines for resuscitation call for open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instead of standard external CPR under the following circumstances associated with pulselessness:

1) chest already open;

2) penetrating thoracic trauma;

3) suspected intrathoracic hemorrhage;

4) suspected pulmonary embolism (thoracotomy permits disruption or removal of emboli);

5) deep hypothermia (open chest allows direct warming of the heart for defibrillation); and

6) no palpable artificial pulse during standard external CPR basic life support, as is sometimes encountered in cases of barrel chest or spine deformities.

We will present evidence in support of a 7th indication, that is when standard external CPR advanced life support efforts do not result in the prompt restoration of spontaneous circulation, as may be the case after prolonged unwitnessed cardiac arrest or in patients with severe myocardial disease.

Historically, open-chest CPR has been used effectively to reverse cardiac arrest in laboratory animals since the 1980s and in patients since 1900. We conducted interviews with Drs. DelGuercio, Johnson, Stephenson and Leighninger (for Beck), who have had extensive experience with open-chest CPR. All confirmed personal experience of one of us (PS) with open-chest CPR in the 1950s, and anecdotal reports, that during direct cardiac massage, the heart usually regained color, spontaneous breathing returned, survivors had a very low incidence of neurologic deficit, and complications were almost non-existent. Stephenson's review of 1200 cases of open-chest CPR hospital-wide between 1900 and 1950 (1) report an overall recovery rate of 30%. However, after Kouwenhoven's report on closed-chest CPR in 1960 (2), open-chest CPR became a forgotten art.

Type
Section Two—Clinical Topics
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , Fall 1985 , pp. 242 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stephenson, HE, Reid, LC, Hinton, JW. Some common denominators in 1200 cases of cardiac arrest. Ann Surg 1953; 137:731.Google Scholar
2 Kouwenhoven, WB, Jude, JR, Knickerbocker, GG. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA 1960; 173:1060.Google Scholar
3 Bircher, N, Safar, P, Stewart, R. A comparison of standard, “MAST”-augmented and open-chest CPR in dogs. A preliminary investigation. Crit Care Med 1980; 8:147.Google Scholar
4 Bircher, N, Safar, P. Comparison of standard and “new” closed-chest CPR and open-chest CPR in dogs. Crit Care Med 1981; 9:384.Google Scholar
5 Alifimoff, JK, Safar, P, Bircher, N, et al. Cardiac resuscitability after closed-chest, MAST-augmented and open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Anesthesiology 1980; 53(suppl):S151.Google Scholar
6 Alifimoff, JK, Safar, P, Bircher, N, et al. Cerebral recovery after prolonged closed-chest, MAST-augmented and open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Anesthesiology 1980; 53(suppl):S147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Bircher, N, Safar, P. Cerebral preservation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:185–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Byrne, D, Pass, HI, Neely, WA, et al. External versus internal cardiac massage in normal and chronically ischemic dogs. Am Surgeon 1980; 46:657.Google Scholar
9 Symon, KL, Bradston, NM, Strong, AJ. Auto-regulation in acute focal ischemia. Stroke 1976; 7:547.Google Scholar
10 Auckland, K. Bower, BF, Berliner, RW. Measurement of local blood flow with hydrogen gas. Circ Res 1964; 14:164.Google Scholar
11 Stajduhar, K, Steinberg, R, Sotosky, M, et al. Cerebral blood flow and common carotid artery blood flow during open-chest CPR in dogs. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13:285 (abstract).Google Scholar