Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:15:43.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Principles of Disaster Management Lesson 11: Personnel Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Abstract

A disaster manager must be able to evaluate staff members in order to make effective staffing decisions during the transitions between phases of a disaster and to help improve the performance of the operation by determining what aspects of an individual's work needs improvement. Criteria for personnel appraisal and measures of performance, objective or subjective, are essential to conduct a fair and thorough evaluation. Errors introduce bias into the appraisal in the form of a “halo” effect, harsh or lenient ratings, a central tendency error, or recency effect, but recognition of these errors helps reduce their effect. A results-based appraisal program is favored because it focuses on what the worker achieves. Regular appraisal periods are suggested for optimal improvement in performance. Suggestions are given for an effective personnel appraisal, such as focusing on positive work performance, being aware of biases in judging people, and being specific when citing examples of work performance.

Resumen

Un Director de Desastres debe ser capaz de evaluar a miembros del personal para tomar decisiones efectivas durante la transición entre fases de un desastre y ayudar a mejorar la ejecución de la operación, determinando que aspectos de un trabajo individual necesita mejorarse. Los criterios objetivos y subjetivos para evaluar y medir el desempeño del personal, son esenciales para conducir una evaluación exhaustiva y justa. Errores inducidos por pre-juicio en la evaluación en forma de efecto de “halo”, posiciones severas o indulgentes, un error con tendencia central o efecto reticente, pero el reconocimiento de esos errores ayuda a reducir su efecto. Un programa basado en evaluación de resultados, es favorecido por que se centra en lo que el trabajador logra. Se sugieren períodos regulares de evaluación para optima mejoría en la actuación; se dan sugerencias para una evaluación efectiva de personal tales como, enfocarse en un desempeño positivo de trabajo, mantenerse alejado de prejuicios en juzgar a personas y ser especifico cuando citen ejemplos de ejecución de trabajo.

The journal would like to thank WADEM members, Felipe Cruz-Vega (MD, Director, Medical Services, Mexican Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico), and Daniel Rodriguez (MD, Department of Medicine, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica) for their translations of these abstracts.

Type
Fred C. Cuny Memorial Continuing Education Series
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. 1.Cowan, J: A Human Factors Approach to Appraisals. In Fundamentals of Management Personnel (November–December 1975), pp 4956.Google Scholar