Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Prehospital Use of a Prototype Esophageal Detection Device: A Word of Caution!

  • Charles D. Marley (a1), David R. Eitel (a2), Mark F. Koch (a3), Dean R. Hess (a4) and Michael A. Taigman (a5)...

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the effectiveness of a prototype esophageal detection device (EDD) during use in the prehospital setting.

Design/Setting:

Prospective convenience sample in a prehospital setting.

Population:

Intubated adult patients.

Interventions:

The study device was used to determine esophageal or endotracheal placement of endotracheal tubes in intubated patients. Clinical means were used to confirm tube location. A data sheet was completed for each patient.

Results:

Of 105 uses of the device, 17 of 17 esophageal tubes were identified correctly (100% sensitivity). Sixty-five of 88 tracheal tubes were correctly identified (78% specificity). There was intermediate reinflation of the device on 13 of the 65 tracheal tubes. Five tests were indeterminate. There were no false negatives (negative predictive value 100%), but 18 false positives (positive predictive value 48%).

Conclusion:

This prototype EDD adequately identifies esophageally placed endotracheal tubes. Correct identification of endotracheally placed tubes was less sensitive. Much work needs to be done regarding the use of negative aspiration devices to identify placement of endotracheal tubes.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Hanover General Hospital, 300 Highland Avenue, Hanover, PA 17331, USA

References

Hide All
1. Marley, CD, Eitel, DR, Anderson, TE, et al. : Evaluation of a prototype esophageal detection device. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:503507.
2. Andersen, KH, Hald, A: Assessing the position of the tracheal tube: The reliability of different methods. Anesthesia 1989;44:984985.
3. Wee, MYK: The oesophageal detector device: Assessment of a new method to distinguish oesophageal from tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1988;43:2729.
4. Zaleski, L, Abello, D, Gold, MI: The esophageal detector device: Does it work? Anesthesiology 1993;79:242247.
5. Vukmir, RB, Heller, MB, Stein, KL: Confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A miniaturized infrared qualitative CO2 detector. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:726729.
6. Wee, MYK, Walker, AKY: The oesophageal detector device: An assessment with uncuffed tubes in children. Anaesthesia 1991;46:869871.
7. Haynes, SR, Morton, NS: Use of the oesophageal detector device in children under one year of age. Anaesthesia 1990;45:10671069.
8. Oberly, D, Stein, S, Hess, D, et al. : An evaluation of the esophageal detection device. Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:317320.
9. O'Leary, JJ, Pollard, BJ, Ryan, JJ: A method of detecting oesophageal intubation or confirming tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1988;16:299301.
10. Salem, MR, Safai, Y, Joseph, NJ, et al. : Efficacy of the self-inflating bulb in detecting esophageal intubation. Anesthesiology 1994;80:4248.
11. Simple esophageal detector may increase intubation safety. Biomedical Safety and Standards 1994;24:9091.
12. Morton, NS, Stuart, JC, Thomson, MF, Wee, MYK: The oesophageal detector device: Successful use in children. Anaesthesia 1989;44:523524.
13. Williams, KN, Nunn, JF: The oesophageal detector device: A prospective trial on 100 patients. Anaesthesia 1989;44:412414.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed