Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Misconception as a Barrier to Teaching about Disasters

  • David E. Alexander (a1)

Abstract

Introduction:

This paper is a report on an exercise designed to reveal the extent of belief in the common myths about disasters held by members of four groups of students from the University of Massachusetts and three groups of trainee emergency workers from Italy.

Methods:

A questionnaire was administered in which students and trainees were asked to agree or disagree with 19 statements about disasters. These statements were based on common misconceptions about disasters and are at least statements untenable in statistical terms, if not downright wrong. In each case, a Likert scale was used to assess the strength of the students' and trainees' agreement or disagreement with the statements.

Results:

The results suggest that some of the misconceptions (for example, that panic and looting are widespread reactions to disaster) were strongly held, whereas others (for instance, that disasters cannot be managed) were less well-rooted. Despite years of refutation by experts, all groups firmly believed that dead bodies constitute a health hazard if they are not disposed of quickly. Attitudes to the proposition that technology offers a solution to the disaster problem were equivocal.

Conclusions:

Though the results of the study by no means were homogeneous, students and emergency workers, on either side of the Atlantic, bring many of the same misconceptions that the mass media continually propagates. These beliefs represent a serious challenge for the instructor who wants to ensure that disasters and emergencies are not misconstrued.

Copyright

Corresponding author

David E. Alexander, PhD Professore a Contratto Ministeriale Dipartimento di Sanita Pubblica Universita degli Studi di Firenze Viale Morgagni 48 50134 Firenze, Italy E-mail: david.alexander@unifi.it

References

Hide All
1. Larsson, G, Enander, A: Preparing for disaster: Public attitudes and actions. Disaster Prevention Managment 1997;6(1):1121.
2. Brilly, M, Polic, M: Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation. Nat Haz Earth Sys Sci 2005;5(3):345355.
3. Associated Press: El Salvador buries quake victims, 15 January 2001. Available at http://highbeam.com/doc/1P1-39749331.html. Accessed 29 March 2007.
4. Kirschenbaum, A: Preparing for the inevitable: Environmental risk perceptions and disaster preparedness. Int J Mass Emer Disasters 2005;23(2):97127.
5. Couch, SR: The cultural scene of disasters: Conceptualizing the field of disasters and popular culture. Int J Mass Emer Disasters 2000;18(1):2138.
6. Palm, R: Urban earthquake hazards: The impact of culture on perceived risk and response in the USA and Japan. Appl Geol 1998;18(1):3546.
7. Bahk, CM, Neuwirth, K: Impact of movie depictions of volcanic disaster on risk perception and judgements. Int J Mass Emer Disasters 2000;18(1):6384.
8. Mitchell, JT, Thomas, DSK, Hill, AA, Cutter, SL: Catastrophe in reel life versus real life: Perpetuating disaster myth through Hollywood films. Int J Mass Emer Disasters 2000;18(3):383402.
9. Quarantelli, EL: Realities and mythologies in disaster films. Communications 1985;11:3144.
10. Fischer, HW III : Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction and its Perpetuation: The Sociology of Disaster. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1994.
11. Grendstad, G, Selle, P: Cultural myths of human and physical nature: Integrated or separated? Risk Anal 2000;20(1):2740.
12. Arnold, JL: Disaster myths and Hurricane Katrina 2005: Can public officials and the media learn to provide responsible crisis communication during disasters? Prehosp Disast Med 2006;21(1):14.
13. Fischer, HW III, Drain, EM: Local offices of emergency preparedness (LEMA) belief in disaster mythology:What has changed and why? Disaster Prevention Management 1993;2(3):1724.
14. Alley, E: The myths and realities of natural disasters. J Inst Civil Defence 1990;52(1):1925.
15. Noji, EK, (ed.): The Public Health Consequences of Disasters. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997:pp 1718.
16. Quarantelli EL: Reality and myth in community disasters. UNDRO News (Nov–Dec 1982):69.
17. Johnson, NR: Panic and the breakdown of social order: Popular myth, social theory, empirical evidence. Sociol Focus 1987;20(3):171183.
18. Scanlon, TJ: Post-disaster rumor chains: A case study. Mass Emerg 1977;2:121126.
19. Wenger, DE, Dykes, JD, Sebok, TD, Neff, JL: It's a matter of myths: An empirical examination of individual insights into disaster response. Mass Emerg 1975;1:3346.
20. Alexander, DE: Natural Disasters. London: Routledge; Boston: Springer. 1993:1620.
21. Shaw, R, Shiwaku, K, Kobayashi, H, Kobayashi, M: Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness. Disaster Prevention Management 2004;13(1):3949.
22. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO): Natural Disasters: Protecting the Public's Health. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2000.
23. Katrina Lessons Learned Review Group: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. Washington DC: The White House: p 40.
24. British Broadcasting Corporation News: “Fear Exceeded Crime's Reality in New Orleans”. Report, 29 Sep 2005. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk. Accessed 30 September 2005.
25. Quarantelli, EL: Looting and Antisocial Behavior in Disasters. Newark DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 1994.
26. Large, T: Experts say mass burials do more harm than good. Reuters Alertnet 30 Dec 2003. Available at http://www.alertnet.org. Accessed 03 January 2004.
27. Pan-American Health Organization: Epidemiological Surveillance After Natural Disaster. Scientific Publication 420. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization, 1982.
28. de Ville de Goyet, C. Epidemics caused by dead bodies: A disaster myth that does not want to die. Pan Amer J Pub Health 2004;15:297299.
29. Floret, N, Viel, JF, Mauny, F, Hoen, B, Piarroux, R: Negligible risk for epidemics after geophysical disasters. Emerg Infect Diseases 2006;12(4):543548.
30. Paulozzi, LJ: Great myths in disaster relief: Epidemics. J Environ Health 1980;43(3):140143.
31. de Ville de Goyet, C: Stop propagating disaster myths. Prehosp Disast Med 1999:14(1):910.
32. Fritz, CE: Convergence Behavior in Disasters: A Problem in Social Control. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1957.
33. Goltz, JD: Are the news media responsible for the disaster myths? A content analysis of emergency response imagery. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 1984;2(3):345368.
34. Drabek, TE: Human System Response to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
35. Quarantelli, EL (ed): What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question. London: Routledge, 1998.
36. Perry, RW, Quarantelli, EL (eds): What is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. Philadelphia: Xlibris, 2005.
37. Alexander, DE: Confronting Catastrophe: New Perspectives on Natural Disasters. Harpenden, UK: Terra Publishing; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:137171.
38. Page, RA, Blume, JA, Joyner, WB: Earthquake shaking and damage to buildings. Sci 1975;189:601608.
39. , Alexander 1993; op cit:1620.
40. cf. Jennings-Sanders, A, Frisch, N, Wing, S: Nursing students' perceptions about disaster nursing. Disaster Management Response 2005;3(3):8085.
41. Smith-Cumberland, TL, Feldman, RH: Survey of EMTs' attitudes towards death. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(3):184188.
42. , Alexander, 2000; op. cit.:12.
43. Brislin, RW: Cross-Xultural Research Methods: Strategies, Problems, Applications. In: Altman, I, Rapoport, A, Wohwill, JF (eds): Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 4, Environment and Culture. New York: Plenum, 1980:4782.
44. Ploughman, P: The American print news media “construction” of five natural disasters. Disasters 1995;19(4):308326.
45. Fothergill, A: Knowledge transfer between researchers and practitioners. Nat Hazards Rev 2000;1(2):9198.
45. Gori, PL: Communication between scientists and practitioners: The important link in knowledge utilization. Earthquake Spectra 1991;7(1):8995.

Keywords

Misconception as a Barrier to Teaching about Disasters

  • David E. Alexander (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed