Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Maximum Time-to-Rescue After the 1908 Messina-Reggio Calabria Earthquake was 20 Days: Hints for Disaster Planning?

  • Natale Gaspare De Santo (a1), Carmela Bisaccia (a2) and Luca Salvatore De Santo (a3) (a4)

Abstract

Introduction

Maximum time-to-rescue has been studied accurately for many earthquakes in the years 1985-2004. No study is available for historical quakes.

Hypothesis/Problem

This study aimed to evaluate long-term survivors (from the fifth day after the quake) of the Messina-Reggio Calabria earthquake (1908; Italy), which is considered, historically, to be the worst seismic event in Europe.

Methods

Accurate readings of 11 national newspapers from the fifth day after the quake looking for rescued persons and transferring, to an ad hoc form, all data relating to each rescued person.

Results

The maximum time-to rescue was 20 days. There were 225 survivors, among them 51 children (22.6 %). For 23 out 225 rescued persons, there was evidence of availability of foods and drinkable fluids while under the rubble.

Conclusion

The maximum time-to-rescue under the debris following this historical earthquake far exceeds that of all other quakes that occurred in the years 1985-2004. The long survival under debris was probably due to the lack of an order to stop search and rescue. Recent strategies reducing the time for search and rescue carry the risk of missing survivors.

De Santo NG , Bisaccia C , De Santo LS . Maximum Time-to-Rescue After the 1908 Messina-Reggio Calabria Earthquake was 20 Days: Hints for Disaster Planning? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(3):249252.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Luca Salvatore De Santo, MD, FESC Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Foggia Viale Luigi Pinto 1, 71122 Foggia, Italy E-mail: luca.desanto@unifg.it

Footnotes

Hide All

Conflicts of interest: none

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Colletta, P. Storia del reame di Napoli dal 1734 sino al 1823. Volume 1 and 2. Capoluogo Canton Ticino, Tipografia Elvetica; 1834;Vol. 2:216-223.
2. Lopez, M, Leon, N. Babies of the earthquake: follow-up study of their first 15 months. Hillside J Clin Psychol. 1989;11(2):147-168.
3. Sever, M, Erek, E, Vanholder, R, et al. The Marmara Earthquake: epidemiological analysis of victims of nephrological problems. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):1114-1123.
4. Sever, M, Erek, E, Vanholder, R, et al. Lessons learned from the Marmara Disaster. Time period under the rubble. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(11):2443-2449.
5. Pocan, S, Ozcan, S, Us, MH, et al. Crush syndrome and acute renal failure in the Marmara earthquake. Mil Med. 2002;167(6):516-518.
6. Tanaka, K. The Kobe earthquake: the system response. A disaster report from Japan. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996;3(4):263-269.
7. Handelman, S. Soviets buried by quake survive 35 days. Toronto Star. January 13, 1989:pA1.
8. Goddard, J. Buried for 27 days. Haiti earthquake survivor’s amazing story. The Telegraph. March 28, 2010.
9. Basu, M. Nepal earthquake. Teenager pulled live from rubble on day six Nepal’s tragedy. CNN. May 1, 2015.
10. Macintyre, AG, Barbera, JA, Smith, ER. Surviving collapsed structures entrapment after earthquakes: a “time-to-rescue” analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(1):4-19.
11. Von Colmers, F. Über die durch das Erdlebn in Messina am December 28, 1908 verursachten Verletzungen. Bericht uber die arztl. Tatigkeit in Rothem-Kreutz-Lazareth der Deutschen Hilfsexpedition zu Syrakus. Archiv für klin. Chirurgie. 1909;90:701-747.
12. D’Antona, A. Relazione sui feriti del terremoto Calabro-Siculo. Clinica Chirurgica dell’Università di Napoli, Stabilimento tipografico S. Morano, Napoli; 1909:p1-36.
13. D’Antona, Rizzo L, Damascelli, D. Relazione sui feriti del terremoto Calabro-Siculo accolti a Napoli. Atti XXI Congresso Società Italiana di Chirurgia, 1909. Edizioni Medico Scientifiche, Roma; 1909:p.237-276.
14. Caminiti, R. Resoconto dei feriti del terremoto curati in Calabria. Gazzetta Internazionale di Medicina. Igiene Interessi Professionali. 1910;14:266-269.
15. Better, OS. History of the crush syndrome: from the earthquake of Messina, Sicily 1908 to Spitak Armenia. Am J Nephrol. 1997;17(3):392.
16. Eknoyan, G. Emergence of the concept of acute renal failure. Am J Nephrol. 2002;22(2-3):226-230.
17. Vanholder, R, Sever, MS, Erek, E, Lameire, N. Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(8):1553-1561.
18. Yokota, J. Crush syndrome in disaster. Japan Medical Association Journal. 2006;48:341-352.
19. Sheng, Z. Medical support in the Tashgan earthquake: a review of the management of mass casualties and certain major injuries. J Trauma. 1987;27(10):1130-1137.
20. Statheropoulos, M, Agapiou, A, Pallis, GC, et al. Factors that affect rescue time in urban search and rescue (USAR) operations. Natural Hazards. 2015;75(1):57-69.

Keywords

Maximum Time-to-Rescue After the 1908 Messina-Reggio Calabria Earthquake was 20 Days: Hints for Disaster Planning?

  • Natale Gaspare De Santo (a1), Carmela Bisaccia (a2) and Luca Salvatore De Santo (a3) (a4)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed