Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:12:46.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Standards and Guidelines on Education and Training for the Multi-disciplinary Health Response to Major Events that Threaten the Health Status of a Community*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

Geert Seynaeve
Affiliation:
Belgium
Frank Archer
Affiliation:
Australia
Judith Fisher
Affiliation:
UK/USA
Brigitte Lueger-Schuster
Affiliation:
Austria
Alison Rowlands
Affiliation:
UK
Phillip Sellwood
Affiliation:
UK
Karel Vandevelde
Affiliation:
Belgium
Anastasia Zigoura
Affiliation:
Greece

Abstract

The 13th World Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine, convened in Melbourne, Australia in May 2003, requested the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM) to lead the development of “International Standards and Guidelines on Education and Training for “Disaster Medicine”. This Paper has been developed by a Working Group of the WADEM Education Committee (“the Working Group”) in response to that request from the international “Disaster Medicine” and emergency health community. The main focus of the Working Group is to develop standards and guidelines for education and training in the multi-disciplinary health response to major events that threaten the health status of a community. The contemporary view is that of a multi-disciplinary health response to major events which threaten the health status of a community, including the prevention and mitigation of future events, and taking account of the broader context in which these events occur.

It is the vision of the Working Group that evidence-based standards and guidelines for education and training must be developed in a broad sense, for all members of the healthcare community. Rather than purely describing isolated performance indicators, the Working Group agreed that priority be given to explaining the general approach, presenting the conceptual framework, clarifying important principles, and describing the educational needs and training requirements for situations for which there exist a major threat to the health status of a community.

It is not the intent to produce an updated educational curriculum for special courses in “Disaster Medicine” by listing levels of theoretical knowledge and clinical skills required for medical doctors, nurses, and paramedics. Nor, does the Working Group think it is useful to repeat requirements and learning outcomes that are part of the normal basic education and training for the various health professionals.

The purpose of this Issues Paper is to present an initial summary of current issues relating to an international perspective of “Disaster Medicine” education and training. This summary has been prepared following discussions within the Working Group of the WADEM Education Committee. The paper aims to stimulate debate and form the basis of further of discussion at an international meeting scheduled to be held in Brussels (Belgium) on 29–31 October 2004.

The Working Group has structured this Issues Paper into five parts and has identified several key issues for discussion.

Part 1: Understanding the contemporary interpretation of the multi-disciplinary health response to major events that threaten the health status of a community

Issue 1: Definitions and terminology in “Disaster Medicine”;

Issue 2: Getting to grips with the contemporary concepts and international trends in “Disaster Medicine”; and,

Issue 3: Valuing personal attributes in “Disaster Medicine” practitioners.

Part 2: Developing an underlying scientific framework for linking theory to practice in “Disaster Medicine”

Issue 4: Creating a scientific framework(s) for “Disaster Medicine”.

Part 3: Defining a conceptual framework and general principals to develop “International Standards and Guidelines on Education and Training for the Multi-disciplinary Health Response to Major Events that Threaten the Health Status of a Community”

Issue 5: Where are we now? Getting to grips with the contemporary concepts and international trends in “Disaster Medicine” education and training.

Issue 6: Where do we want to get to? Identifying contemporary, evidence-based education and training standards and guidelines for “Disaster Medicine” education and training programs.

Issue 7: How do we get there? Overcoming barriers to introducing the International Standards and Guidelines.

Part 4: Maintaining the momentum—improving international collaboration

Issue 8: Exploring the feasibility of an ongoing, international, collaborative network of “Centres of Excellence” in “Disaster Medicine” research and/or education.

Part 5: Additional input

Issue 9: What other issues would you like to bring to the attention of the Working Group?

Conclusions:

The results of the consultation will lead to the development of international standards and guidelines that will be presented and consensus sought during the 14th World Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WCDEM-14) to be convened in Edinburgh in May, 2005.

Type
Issues Paper
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Note: This is an abbreviated version of the complete issue paper. The complete document can be accessed at: http://wadem.medicine.edu/issuepaper.htm.

References

1. Al-Madhari, AF, Keller, AZ: Review of disaster definitions. Prehosp Disast Med 1997; 12(1): 1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Arnold, JL: Disaster medicine in the 21st Century: Future hazards, vulnerabilitie, and risk. Prehosp Disast Med 2002: 17(1); 311.Google Scholar
3. Bradt, D, Abraham, K, Franks, R: A strategic plan for disaster medicine in Australasia. Emergency Medicine 2003; 15: [271–282.Google Scholar
4. Britton, NR: A new emergency management for the new millennium? Aust J Emerg Management 20012002; Summer: 4454.Google Scholar
5. Burkle, FM (ed): Special issue: Complex Emergencies: Prehosp Disast Med 2001; 16(4).Google Scholar
6. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Avalaibe at http://www.em-dat.net/disasters/sundata/wdr/wdr2002.htm).Google Scholar
7. Columbia University's School of Nursing website. Available at http://www.nursing.hs.columbia.edu.Google Scholar
8. Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs. Available at http://www.caahep.org/caahep.Google Scholar
9. Emergency Management Australia. Available at http://www.ema.gov.au/ema/emaDisasters.nsf Google Scholar
10. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies The World Disasters Report (2002) Available at http://www.ifrc.org/publicat/wdr2002/index.asp. Google Scholar
11. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Available at http://www.ifrc.org/publicat/wdr2003/contents.asp.Google Scholar
12. National Highway Transportation Safety Agency: The EMS Education Agenda for the Future. Available at http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/ems/EdAgenda/final/.Google Scholar
13. Sundnes, KO, Birnbaum, ML (eds): Health disaster management: Guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Prehosp Disast Med 2003; 17 (Suppl 3).Google Scholar
14. The British Association for Immediate Care (BASICS) website. Available at http://www.basedn.freeserve.co.uk/. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar
15. The World Health Organization website. Available at http://www.who.int/en. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar
16. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs: Relief Website. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/w/rwb.nsf. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar
17. Pan American Health Organization website. Available at http://www.paho.org/default.htm. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar
18. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs: Integrated Regional Information website. Available at http://www.irinnews.org. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar
19. 13th Congress of the World Association of Disaster and Emergency Medicine: Position statement: Melbourne statement. Prehosp Disast Med 2003; 18(3): 162.Google Scholar
20. Columbia University's School of Nursing: Bioterrorism and Emergency Readiness: Competencies for ALL Public Health Workers. Available at http://www.nursing.hs.columbia.edu/institute-centers/chphsr.btcomps.html. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar
21. University of Sussex: New research to examine crowd panic in emergencies. 23 November 2003. Available at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/press_office/media/media358.shtml. Accessed 17 August 2004.Google Scholar