Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:24:20.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact Evaluation Of A Community Wide Resuscitation Training Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Edmund M. Ricci
Affiliation:
From the Resuscitation Research Center and the Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA 15260, USA. Supported by NIH-NHLBI Grant HR-42965.
Catherine L. Malloy
Affiliation:
From the Resuscitation Research Center and the Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA 15260, USA. Supported by NIH-NHLBI Grant HR-42965.
Peter Safar
Affiliation:
From the Resuscitation Research Center and the Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA 15260, USA. Supported by NIH-NHLBI Grant HR-42965.

Extract

This study focused upon one critical condition, acute respiratory insufficiency (ARI), and the treatment patterns used before and after a training program designed to teach hospital personnel the most current methods of treating acute respiratory insufficiency. The study was a methodological investigation in which a means for collecting and analyzing data concerning the treatment of an acute health problem was developed, implemented, and assessed. It was also an attempt to evaluate the quality of treatment of ARI in a set of hospitals and to assess the extent to which a training program was able to affect the quality of treatment. Thirdly, the study was an epidemiological investigation of the extent to which ARI exists in hospital critical care units.

Type
Part I: Research-Education-Organization
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Donabedian, A. A Guide to Medical Care Administration. Vol. II: Medical Care Appraisal-Quality Utilization. New York: The American Public Health Association, Inc. 1969.Google Scholar
2. Decker, B, Bonner, P. Criteria in Peer Review. Cambridge: Arthur D. Little, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
3. Reed, D, Lapenas, C. Data retrieved in the coronary care unit: Prospective vs retrospective. Med Care 1975;13:1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Phillips, O et al. The Baltimore anesthesia study committee: Review of 1,025 postoperative deaths. JAMA 1960;174:2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar