Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Feedback to Emergency Medical Services Providers: The Good, the Bad, and the Ignored

  • Elisabeth F. Mock (a1), Keith D. Wrenn (a1), Seth W. Wright (a1), T. Chadwick Eustis (a1) and Corey M. Slovis (a1)...

Abstract

Hypothesis:

To determine the type and frequency of immediate unsolicited feedback received by emergency medical service (EMS) providers from patients or their family members and emergency department (ED) personnel.

Methods:

Prospective, observational study of 69 emergency medical services providers in an urban emergency medical service system and 12 metropolitan emergency departments. Feedback was rated by two medical student observers using a prospectively devised original scale.

Results:

In 295 encounters with patients or family, feedback was rated as follows: 1) none in 224 (76%); 2) positive in 51 (17%); 3) negative in 19 (6%); and 4) mixed in one (<1%). Feedback from 254 encounters with emergency department personnel was rated as: 1) none in 185 (73%); 2) positive in 46 (18%); 3) negative in 21 (8%); and 4) mixed in 2 (1%). Patients who had consumed alcohol were more likely to give negative feedback than were patients who had not consumed alcohol. Feedback from emergency department personnel occurred more often when the emergency medical service provider considered the patient to be critically ill.

Conclusion:

The two groups provided feedback to emergency medical service providers in approximately one quarter of the calls. When feedback was provided, it was positive more than twice as often as it was negative. Emergency physicians should give regular and constructive feedback to emergency medical services providers more often than currently is the case.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, 703 Oxford House, Nashville, Tennessee 37212USA

References

Hide All
1. Hudson, T: Caring important in ED patient satisfaction survey. Hospitals 1992;2:3638.
2. Krishel, SW, Baraff, LJ: Effect of emergency department information on patient satisfaction. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:568572.
3. Bursch, B, Beezy, J, Shaw, R: Emergency department satisfaction: What matters most? Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:586591.
4. Swor, RA: Quality assurance in emergency medical service systems. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1992;10:597610.
5. Polsky, SS, Weigand, JV: Quality assurance in emergency medical service systems. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1990;8:7584.
6. Soumerai, SB, Avom, J: Principles of educational outreach (“academic detailing”) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA 1990;263:549556.
7. Fontanarosa, PB: Occupational considerations for the prehospital care provider. Emerg Med Clin N Amer 1990;8:119133.
8. Neale, AV: Work stress in emergency medical technicians. J Qccup Med 1991;33:991997.

Keywords

Feedback to Emergency Medical Services Providers: The Good, the Bad, and the Ignored

  • Elisabeth F. Mock (a1), Keith D. Wrenn (a1), Seth W. Wright (a1), T. Chadwick Eustis (a1) and Corey M. Slovis (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed