Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T00:36:12.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Falkland Islands Campaign Resuscitation and Anesthesia in a Battle Situation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Malcolm D. Jowitt
Malcolm D. Jowitt
Affiliation:
Cambridge Military Hospital, Aldershot, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the early summer of 1982, Her Majesty's Armed Forces embarked upon an operation to repossess the Falkland Islands. The campaign was fought over a difficult terrain and under hostile climatic conditions, 8,000 miles from home shores. Resupply was difficult, sometimes unreliable and, during the initial battles, medical practitioners supporting combat troops had to practice ingenuity and improvisation. During the battles, 225 British Soldiers were killed and 777 wounded. Of the wounded who presented at the British Advanced Surgical Centers, only 7 subsequently died (1%). 658 battle casualties were dealt with at the various land-based surgical facilities. About 270 general anesthetics were given.

Type
Section Three—Military Contributions to Disaster Medicine
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , Issue 1: Military and Disaster Medicine , Spring 1985 , pp. 43 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Houghton, IT. The Tri-Service Anaesthetic apparatus. Anaesthesia 1981; 36:1904–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Sanders, CD. Anaesthetic equipment for disasters. British Journal of Clinical Equipment, January 1977; 5–9.Google Scholar
(3)Epstein, H, et al. The Tri-Service Anaesthetic and resuscitation system. Disaster Medicine (Springer-Verlag), 1980; 2:90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Safar, P, Gedang, I: Inexpensive system for the administration of ether. Anesthesiology 1961; 22:323–324.Google Scholar
(5)Pearson, J, Safar, P: Anesthesia with minimal equipment. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1961; 40:664–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(6)Ruben, H: Combination resuscitator and aspirator. Anesthesiology 1958; 19:408.Google ScholarPubMed
(7)MacIntosh, RR: A plea for simplicity. British Med J 1955; 2:1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(8)Knight, RJ, et al. First and second line treatment in the Falklands; a retrospective view, (in press).Google Scholar
(9)Williams, JG, et al. Resuscitation experience in the Falkland Island campaign. Brit Med J 1983; 286:775–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(10)Dudley, HAF: Some aspects of modern battle surgery. The Vietnam experience. Journal of The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1973; 18:67–75.Google ScholarPubMed
(11)Takaori, M, Safar, P: Treatment of massive hemorrhage with colloid and crystalloid solutions. J Amer Med Assoc 1967; 199:297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(12)Nettles, DC, et al. Ketamine induction in poor risk patients. Anaesthesia and Analgesia 1973; 46:1122–1127.Google Scholar
(13)Rust, M, Kolb, E. Pain control and anaesthesia in emergency and catastrophe medicine. Muench Med Wochenschrift 1981; 123:1122–1127Google Scholar
(14)Bull, PT, Tigne, SQM. Anaesthesia in the South Atlantic (Letter). Anaesthesia 1983; 38:807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Richards, T: Conference report - Medical lessons from the Falklands. British Med J 1983; 286:790–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Beecher, HK: Resuscitation and Anesthesia for Wounded Men — The Management of Traumatic Shock. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, 1949.Google Scholar