Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System

  • Eric J. Cortez (a1) (a2), Ashish R. Panchal (a3), James E. Davis (a1) and David P. Keseg (a1) (a3)

Abstract

Introduction

The staffing of ambulances with different levels of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers is a difficult decision with evidence being mixed on the benefit of each model.

Hypothesis/Problem

The objective of this study was to describe a pilot program evaluating alternative staffing on two ambulances utilizing the paramedic-basic (PB) model (staffed with one paramedic and one emergency medical technician[EMT]).

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted from September 17, 2013 through December 31, 2013. The PB ambulances were compared to geographically matched ambulances staffed with paramedic-paramedic (PP ambulances). One PP and one PB ambulance were based at Station A; one PP and one PB ambulance were based at Station B. The primary outcome was total on-scene time. Secondary outcomes included time-to-electrocardiogram (EKG), time-to-intravenous (IV) line insertion, IV-line success rate, and percentage of protocol violations. Inclusion criteria were all patients requesting prehospital services that were attended to by these teams. Patients were excluded if they were not attended to by the study ambulance vehicles. Descriptive statistics were reported as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Mann-Whitley U test was used for significance testing (P<.05).

Results

Median on-scene times at Station A for the PP ambulance were shorter than the PB ambulance team (PP: 10.1 minutes, IQR 6.0-15; PB: 13.0 minutes, IQR 8.1-18; P=.01). This finding also was noted at Station B (PP: 13.5 minutes, IQR 8.5-19; PB: 14.3 minutes, IQR 9.9-20; P=.01). There were no differences between PP and PB ambulance teams at Station A or Station B in time-to-EKG, time-to-IV insertion, IV success rate, and protocol violation rates.

Conclusion

In the setting of a well-developed EMS system utilizing an all-Advanced Life Support (ALS) response, this study suggests that PB ambulance teams may function well when compared to PP ambulances. Though longer scene times were observed, differences in time to ALS interventions and protocol violation rates were not different. Hybrid ambulance teams may be an effective staffing alternative, but decisions to use this model must address clinical and operational concerns.

Cortez EJ , Panchal AR , Davis JE , Keseg DP . The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(2):175179.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Eric Cortez, MD, FAEMS 3639 South Parsons Ave Columbus, Ohio 43207 USA E-mail: ejcortez@columbus.gov

Footnotes

Hide All
Conflicts of interest: none

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Overton, J, Gunderson, M. “Medical Oversight of EMS.” In: Bass RR, Brice JH, Delbridge TR, Gunderson MR, (eds). Emergency Medical Services: Clinical Practice and Systems Oversight. USA: Mosby-Year Book, Inc. and National Association of EMS Physicians; 2009: 153-179.
2. Stout, N, Pepe, PE, Mosesso, VN. All-advanced life support vs. tiered-response ambulance systems. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;4(1):1-6.
3. Key, CB, Pepe, PE, Persse, DE, Calderon, D. Can first responders be sent to selected 9-1-1 emergency medical services calls without an ambulance? Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(4):339-346.
4. Kelly, AM, Currell, A. Do ambulance crews with one advanced paramedic skills officer have longer scene times than crews with two? Emerg Med J. 2002;19(2):152-154.
5. Isenberg, DL, Bissell, R. Does advanced life support provide benefits to patients? A literature review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(4):265-270.
6. Ryynanen, OP, Iirola, T, Reitala, J, Palve, J, Malmivaara, A. Is advanced life support better than basic life support in prehospital care? A systemic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;23(18):62.
7. Bakalos, G, Mamali, M, Kamninos, C, et al. Advanced life support versus basic life support in the prehospital setting: a meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2011;82(9):1130-1137.
8. Sanghavi, P, Jena, AB, Newhouse, JP, Zalslavsky, AM. Outcomes of basic versus advanced life support for out-of-hospital medical emergencies. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(9):681-690.
9. Eschmann, NM, Pirrallo, RG, Aufderheide, TP, Lerner, EB. The association between emergency medical services staffing patterns and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(1):71-77.
10. Persse, DE, Key, CB, Bradley, RN, Miller, CC, Dhingra, A. Cardiac arrest survival as a function of ambulance deployment strategy in a large urban emergency medical service system. Resuscitation. 2003;59(1):97-104.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System

  • Eric J. Cortez (a1) (a2), Ashish R. Panchal (a3), James E. Davis (a1) and David P. Keseg (a1) (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.