Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:19:58.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary examination for revealing the provenance dependency of the lattice spacing of biotite for the provenance estimation of Atamadai-type pottery (2500–1500 BC) by XRD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2021

Shintaro Ichikawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka814-0180, Japan
Kana Miyamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka814-0180, Japan
Tsutomu Kurisaki
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka814-0180, Japan
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: sichikawa@fukuoka-u.ac.jp

Abstract

A total of 77 pottery shards originating from the Middle Jomon period (2500–1500 BC) were excavated from the Hinoki site in Tochigi, Japan. Fifty-nine of the shards were Atamadai-type pottery in which fragments containing biotite were mixed during the manufacturing process. For the provenance estimation of the biotite temper in the Atamadai-type pottery pieces, the reliance of the biotite's lattice spacing on the samples’ origin was verified using X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of seven biotite-containing rocks possessing the different provenances. Three samples showed significant differences in the lattice spacing of biotite 001. The remaining samples indicated no significant differences. In addition to lattice spacing, the clarification of the provenance dependency also requires the measurement of the solid-solution ratio (Mg/Fe).

Type
Proceedings Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Centre for Diffraction Data

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gates-Rector, S. D. and Blanton, T. N. (2019). “The Powder Diffraction File: a quality materials characterization database,” Powd. Diffr. 34, 352360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, S., Morikawa, M., Kurisaki, T., and Yamaguchi, T. (2018). “Finger print minerals for provenance estimation of Atamadai-type pottery (2500–1500 BC) from Hinoki site (Tochigi, Japan) using powder XRD,” Adv. X-ray Anal. 61, 1016.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, S., Sakito, Y., and Kurisaki, T. (2019). “Mineral analysis of river sand around Mt. Tsukuba for provenance estimation of Atamadai type pottery (2500–1500 BC) from Hinoki site (Tochigi, Japan),” Powd. Diffr. 34, 160163.Google Scholar
Kasai, M., Matsumoto, T., Ichikawa, S., Nakamura, T., and Tsukamoto, M. (2014). “Analysis of Atamadai type potteries from Hinoki site,” Res. Bull. Tochigi Archaeol. Res. Cent. (in Japanese) 22, 754.Google Scholar
Ohbuchi, A. and Nakamura, T. (2018). “Sample preparation and quantitative analysis for powder X-ray diffractometry,” in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, edited by Meyers, R. A. (Wiley, New York), pp. 119.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Y. (1984). “Analysis of pottery clay (1),” Res. Bull. Chiba Archaeol. Res. Cent. (in Japanese) 8, 8091.Google Scholar
Smith, J. R. and Yoder, H. S. (1955). “Variations in X-ray powder diffraction patterns of plagioclase feldspars,” Am. Mineral. 41, 632647.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Y. (1999). “Textual analysis of coarse grains in Jomon pottery – an attempt at interpretation for solution of production area and technique,” Bull. Yamanashi Res. Inst. Cult. Prop. Teikyo Univ. (in Japanese) 9, 303332.Google Scholar
Tsukamoto, M. (2008). “Atamadai type pottery,” in A Comprehensive List of Jomon Pottery (in Japanese), edited by Kobayashi, T. (Um Promotion, Tokyo), pp. 384391.Google Scholar