Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T18:19:58.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Particle statistics in quantitative X-ray diffractometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

N. J. Elton*
Affiliation:
ECC International Research & Development, John Keay House, St Austell, Cornwall PL25 4DJ, United Kingdom
P. D. Salt
Affiliation:
ECC International (Europe), Technology Department, John Keay House, St Austell, Cornwall PL25 4DJ, United Kingdom
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Particle statistics in quantitative X-ray diffractometry relates to the number of particles (crystallites) contributing to the diffracted intensity for a given line. Variations in line intensity between replicate preparations of the same sample arise from statistical variations in the number of diffracting particles. The uncertainty in line intensity, and hence in quantitative estimates of analyte concentration, is termed the particle statistics error. A theoretical estimate of the error for stationary samples qives σPS=ξ[μ*v〉/c]1/2, where μ* is the mass absorption coefficient of the mixture, and 〈v〉 and c are the mean particle volume and mass concentration respectively of the analyte. The factor ξ is a function mainly of diffractometer geometry, but also contains contributions from rocking angle and reflection multiplicity. For measurements of the (112) quartz line with a Philips PW1050 vertical goniometer with 2o divergence slit and 0.3 mm receiving slit, ξ was calculated to be 116 g1/2 cm−5/2 for stationary samples. Three close-cut size fractions of quartz were prepared at various concentrations in a calcium carbonate matrix. Replicate preparations were measured and the standard deviation obtained as a function of particle volume and concentration. After correction for other contributing errors, including counting statistics and thermal fluctuations, the experimental value ξ=122±10 g1/2 cm−5/2 was obtained. The effect of sample spinning is considered briefly and predicted to reduce σPS by a factor of about 5. Experimentally, a reduction in σPS of about this order is observed, but the effect is rather variable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)