Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:03:04.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

About Instrument-, Method- and Matrix-Independence in the Working Equations of the Quantitative X-Ray Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

K. P. Zangalis
K. P. Zangalis
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration, 70 Messoghion Street, 11527 Athens, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In most of the practical problems of the quantitative X-ray analysis, obtaining working equations including only intensity ratios without the sample mass-absorption coefficient is impossible, unless an internal standard is added to the sample. It is shown that the internal standard may be unnecessary if some chemical data are added to the XRD information used. Experimental results justify this claim.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 197 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chung, F. H. (1974a). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, F. H. (1974b). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7, 526–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. L. and Smith, D. K. (1988). Pow. Diff. 3, 205–208.Google Scholar
Hubbard, C. R. and Snyder, R. L. (1988), Pow. Diff. 3, 74–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starks, T.H., Fang, J.H. and Zevin, L.S. (1984), Mathematical Geology, Vol. 16, No.4, 351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangalis, K. P. (1991). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar