Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Biological approaches to public administration and public policy: Introduction

  • Christopher W. Larimer (a1) and Steven A. Peterson (a2)

Abstract

This special issue considers the relationship of the life sciences to both public policy and public administration. This makes sense because the bureaucratic process and public administration are deeply involved in the policy process and the development of substantive public policy. The two subjects are intertwined. And a biological perspective can illuminate many aspects of both. That is the focus of this issue.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Christopher W. Larimer, Department of Political Science, University of Northern Iowa, 349 Sabin Hall, UNI, Cedar Falls, Iowa, 50614. Email: christopher.larimer@uni.edu

References

Hide All
1.Gulick, L., “Introduction,” in Biology and Bureaucracy, White, E. and Losco, J., eds. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986), pp. xiixvi, at p. xv.
2.See also Gulick, L., “Democracy and administration face the future,” Public Administration Review, 1977, 37(6): 706711.10.2307/975339
3.Smith, K. B. and Larimer, C. W., The Public Policy Theory Primer (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017), chap. 9.
4.Somit, A. and Peterson, S. A., eds., Human Nature and Public Policy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).10.1057/9781403982094
5.Meyer-Emerick, N., “Public administration and the life sciences,” Administration & Society, 2007, 38(6): 689708.10.1177/0095399706293077
6.Tybur, J. and Griskevicius, V., “Evolutionary psychology: A fresh perspective for understanding and changing problematic behavior,” Public Administration Review, 2013, 73(1): 1222.10.1111/puar.12003
7.Caldwell, L. K., “Biopolitics: Science, ethics, and public policy,” Yale Review, 1964, 54(1): 116.
8.Caldwell, L. K., “Biology and bureaucracy: The coming confrontation,” Public Administration Review, 1980, 40(1): 112.10.2307/976100
9.Funke, O., “Biopolicy and policymaking,” in Handbook of Biology and Politics, Peterson, S. A. and Somit, A., eds. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 304323.10.4337/9781783476275.00028
10.Birkland, T. A., An Introduction to the Policy Process, 4th ed. (New York: Routledge, 2016).
11.White, E. and Losco, J., eds., Biology and Bureaucracy (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986).
12.Adrian, C., “Ethology and bureaucracy,” paper presented at the International Political Science Association Meeting, Munich, Germany, 1970.
13.Masters, R. D., “Why bureaucracy?,” in Biology and Bureaucracy, White, E. and Losco, J., eds. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986), pp. 149191.
14.Somit, A., “Bureaucratic pathology, public administration, and the life sciences,” in Biology and Bureaucracy, White, E. and Losco, J., eds. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986), pp. 4355.
15.O’Hara, Patrick, “Can ethology bring lucidity to organizational research?,” in Biology and Bureaucracy, White, E. and Losco, J., eds. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986), pp. 305324.
16.Flohr, H., “Bureaucracy and its clients: Exploring a biosocial perspective,” in Biology and Bureaucracy, White, E. and Losco, J., eds. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986), pp. 57116.
17.Peterson, S. A., “Evolution, cognition, and decision-making,” in Handbook of Decision-Making, Morçöl, Göktug, ed. (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2007), pp. 119131.
18.Slovic, P., “Psychic numbing and mass atrocity,” in The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, Shafir, E., ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013), pp. 126142.
19.Vastjfall, E., Slovic, P., Mayorga, M., and Peters, E., “Compassion fade: Affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need,” PLOS One, 2014, 9(6): e100115, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100115.
20.Schubert, J. N., “The impact of food aid on world nutrition,” International Organization, 1981, 35(3): 329354.10.1017/S002081830003246X
21.Blank, R. H., The Political Implications of Human Genetic Technology (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981).
22.Masters, R. D., et al, “Environmental pollution and crime,” Vermont Law Review, 1998, 22: 358382.
23.Butts, K. H., “Climate change and environmental security: Implications for national and homeland security,” in Handbook of Biology and Politics, Peterson, S. A. and Somit, A., eds. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 431444.10.4337/9781783476275.00035
24.Corning, P. A., The Fair Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).10.7208/chicago/9780226116303.001.0001
25.Wilson, E. O., Consilience (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998).
26.Peterson, S. A. and Somit, A., eds. Handbook of Biology and Politics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).10.4337/9781783476275
27.Shafir, E., The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).10.1515/9781400845347

Keywords

Biological approaches to public administration and public policy: Introduction

  • Christopher W. Larimer (a1) and Steven A. Peterson (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.