No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Biotechnology in Public: A Review of Recent Research. John Durant (ed.), London:Science Museum for the European Federation of Biotechnology,1992, 201 pp. ISBN 0-901805-52-1.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Euro barometer Survey 39.1. Available in French or English from M. Lex, DG XII/E-1 SDME 2/65, Commission of the European Communities, Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Hoban, T.J. and Kendall, P.A. (1992). Consumer Attitudes about the Use of Biotechnology in Agriculture and Food Production. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Macer, D.R.J. (1992a). Attitudes to Genetic Engineering: Japanese and International Comparisons. Christchurch, New Zealand: Eubios Ethics Institute.Google Scholar
Macer, D. (1992b). “Public Acceptance of Human Gene Therapy and Perceptions of Human Genetic Manipulation.” Human Gene Therapy 3(5):511–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macer, D. (1993). “Perception of Risks and Benefits of In Vitro Fertilization, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology.” Social Science and Medicine 38(1):23–33.Google Scholar
Macer, D. (1994). Bioethics for the People by the People. Christchurch, New Zealand: Eubios Ethics Institute.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (1987). New Developments in Biotechnology, 2: Public Perceptions of Biotechnology—Background Paper. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rabino, I. (1991). “The Impact of Activist Pressures on Recombinant DNA Research.” Science, Technology and Human Values 16:70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabino, I. (1992). “A Study of Attitudes and Concerns of Genetic Engineering Scientists in Western Europe.” Biotech Forum Europe 9(10):636–40.Google Scholar