Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T18:00:01.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Legislative Politics and Policy Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Craig A. Rimmerman
Craig A. Rimmerman*
Affiliation:
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of the American Congress raises compelling issues for both teachers and students in the examination of three interrelated arenas of analysis: Congressional members, Congress as an institution, and the role of Congress in the American political system. Underlying my approach to teaching Congress is a strong emphasis on discussing the role Congress should play in our Madisonian policy process as well as the role of elected representatives in a representative democracy. In many ways, then, a course on Congress or Legislative Politics and Policy making allows the instructor and students to examine the broader operation of the American political system by looking over the shoulders of congressional members as well as Congress as an institution. In doing so, broad structural questions might be addressed: To what extent is a Madisonian framework of government relevant for confronting and solving the policy problems that we currently face and will likely face in the future? What role can (and should) Congress play in addressing issues, such as the deficit, energy and environmental problems, homelessness, education, and covert foreign policy operations? In confronting these questions, I have found that students seek the opportunity to place Congress in an historical context. In doing so, I ask students to examine the three times in this century when Congress has responded to sweeping presidential domestic policy initiatives, including FDR's New Deal (1933-1936), Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs (1965-1966), and Ronald Reagan's first-term budget and tax cut initiatives (1981).

Type
For the Classroom
Information
The Political Science Teacher , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Winter 1990 , pp. 16 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clem, Alan L. 1989. Congress: Powers, Processes, and Politics. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Crabb, Cecil V. Jr. and Holt, Pat M.. 1989. Invitation to Struggle: Congress the President, and Foreign Policy, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1984. “If as Ralph Nader Says, Congress is ‘The Broken Branch,’ How Come We Love Our Congressmen So Much?” In Woll, Peter, ed., American Government: Readings and Cases, 8th ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fritschler, A. Lee. 1989. Smoking and Politics, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Herson, Lawrence Jr. 1984. The Politics of Ideas: Political Theory and American Public Policy. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1974. Originally published in 1948. The American Political Tradition. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kotz, Nick. 1988. Wild Blue Yonder: Money, Politics, and the B-I Bomber. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
LeLoup, Lance T. 1987. “The Causes and Consequences of Gramm-Rudman-Hollings.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Anahein, Calif., March 26-28, 1987.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1985. The Personal President: Power Invested and Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Maisel, Louis Sandy. 1986. From Obscurity to Oblivion, rev. ed. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1980. Presidential Power, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Parker, Glenn R. 1989. Characteristics of Congress: Patterns in Congressional Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. 1986. Congressional Reform. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1988. Congress: Process and Policy, 4th ed, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. 1983. “Introduction.” In Schick, Allen, ed., Making Economic Policy in Congress. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, Hedrick. 1988. The Power Game. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vogler, David J. and Waldman, Sidney R.. 1985. Congress and Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 1987. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy, 6: 4, pp. 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar