Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T22:41:55.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Starting with the TA: Training the Professor of the 1990s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2016

Michael P. Ryan*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Extract

Virtually half of today's professors will retire in the coming decade (Bowen and Sosa, 1989). This creates both an urgent need and a great opportunity for American colleges and universities to recruit a new generation of educators. Most of the future faculty are in graduate school today. How can this cohort best be prepared today to become effective classroom teachers?

Many universities now have teaching assistant training programs and others are establishing them. Most TA training programs, however, are prompted by short-term concerns about the quality of instruction given undergraduate students today rather than by long-term concerns about the quality of the professoriate tomorrow (Sell, 1987). Since TAs in doctoral granting institutions do a large share of the teaching of undergraduates, short-term concerns are important. Nevertheless, TA training can and should be designed to serve both short- and long-term goals. The TA training program that seeks to achieve long-term goals must deliberately plan its program so that important skills associated with the professor, but not commonly associated with the TA, are taught. Two of these important skills are employed before the first class: course planning and syllabus writing.

Course planning, an activity that occurs before the first class (Stark et al., 1989), improves the course significantly for both teacher and student by clarifying goals and determining ways of achieving them. The syllabus explains the course plan (as well as other information) to the student and, hence, communicates information crucial to the success in the course.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, William G. and Sosa, Julie Ann. 1989. Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences: A Study of Factors Affecting Demand and Supply, 1987-2012. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lowther, Malcolm A., Stark, Joan S., and Martens, Gretchen G.. 1989. “Preparing Course Syllabi for Improved Communication.” Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL.Google Scholar
Ryan, Michael P. and Martens, Gretchen G.. 1989. “Planning a College Course: A Guidebook for the Graduate Teaching Assistant.” Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL.Google Scholar
Sell, G. Roger. 1987. “Preparing Teaching Assistants as Future Faculty: Is this Really the University's Objective?” Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Baltimore, MD, November 23.Google Scholar
Stark, Joan S., Lowther, Malcolm A., Ryan, Michael P., Bomotti, Sally Smith, Genthon, Michele, and Haven, C. Lynne. 1988. Reflections on Course Planning: Faculty and Students Consider Influences and Goals. Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL.Google Scholar
Stark, Joan S., Lowther, Malcolm A., Bentley, Richard J., Ryan, Michael P., Genthon, Michele, Martens, Gretchen G., Shaw, Kathleen M., and Wren, Patricia A.. 1989. Planning Introductory College Courses: Influences on Faculty. Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL.Google Scholar