Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:23:22.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How valuable is a legislative seat? Incumbency effects in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2019

Juan Pablo Micozzi Open the ORCID record for Juan Pablo Micozzi [Opens in a new window]  and
Adrián Lucardi Open the ORCID record for Adrián Lucardi [Opens in a new window]
Juan Pablo Micozzi
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, ITAM, Alvaro Obregon, Distrito Federal, Mexico
Adrián Lucardi*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, ITAM, Alvaro Obregon, Distrito Federal, Mexico
*
*Corresponding author. Email: adrian.lucardi@itam.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many developing countries, national legislative seats are considered less valuable than (subnational) executive positions. Even then, ambitious politicians may seek a legislative seat either (a) as a window of opportunity for jumping to an executive office; or (b) as a consolation prize when no better option is available. Using a regression discontinuity design adapted to a pr setting, we examine these possibilities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies between 1983 and 2011. In line with the consolation prize story, we find that marginal candidates from the Peronist party—which controls most provincial governorships—are more likely to be renominated and serve an additional term in the legislature, but not necessarily to jump to an executive office. The effect is stronger in small provinces.

Keywords

Political careersambitionincumbency advantageregression discontinuityproportional representationArgentina
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 414 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemán, E, Slapin, JB and Ramírez, M (2017) Party strategies, constituency links, and legislative speech. Legislative Studies Quarterly 42, 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, E, Micozzi, JP and Ramírez, M (2018) The hidden electoral connection: Analyzing information requests in the Chilean congress. Journal of Legislative Studies 42, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, A, Depauw, S and Martin, S (2015) Electoral systems and legislators' constituency effort: The mediating effect of electoral vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies 48, 464–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariga, K (2015) Incumbency disadvantage under electoral rules with intraparty competition: Evidence from Japan. The Journal of Politics 77, 874–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariga, K, Horiuchi, Y, Mansilla, RA and Umeda, M (2016) No sorting, no advantage: Regression discontinuity estimates of incumbency advantage in Japan. Electoral Studies 43, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, TD (2016) Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A and Lago, I (2009) A general measure of district competitiveness. Electoral Studies 28, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvecchi, A and Lodola, G (2011) The dual logic of intergovernmental transfers: Presidents, governors, and the politics of coalition-building in Argentina. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41, 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, N-C and Golder, M (2013) Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies 32, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, DM (2009) A regression discontinuity design analysis of the incumbency advantage and tenure in the U.S. House. Electoral Studies 28, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calonico, S, Cattaneo, MD and Titiunik, R (2014) Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82, 2295–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calonico, S, Cattaneo, MD and Titiunik, R (2015) Optimal data-driven regression discontinuity plots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110, 1753–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E and Murillo, MV (2004) Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science 48, 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caminotti, M, Rotman, S and Varetto, C (2011) Carreras políticas y oportunidades “generizadas” en la provincia de Buenos Aires (1983–2007). POSTData 16, 191–221.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, MD, Frandsen, BR and Titiunik, R (2015) Randomization inference in the regression discontinuity design: An application to party advantages in the U.S. Senate. Journal of Causal Inference 3, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, MD, Titiunik, R and Vázquez-Bare, G (2017) Comparing inference approaches for RD designs: A reexamination of the effect of Head Start on child mortality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 36, 643–681.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattaneo, MD, Idrobo, N and Titiunik, R (2019) A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, D and Sekhon, JS (2011) Elections and the regression discontinuity design: Lessons from close U.S. House races, 1942–2008. Political Analysis 19, 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasquetti, D and Micozzi, JP (2014) The subnational connection in unitary regimes: Progressive ambition and legislative behavior in Uruguay. Legislative Studies Quarterly 39, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherny, N, Figueroa, V and Scherlis, G (2018) Quién nomina a los legisladores? La conformación de las listas de candidatos para la Cámara de Diputados en Argentina. Revista SAAP 12, 215–248.Google Scholar
Cox, GW, Fiva, JH and Smith, DM (2019) Measuring the competitiveness of elections. Political Analysis. doi: 10.1017/pan.2019.28.Google Scholar
Crisp, BF and Desposato, SW (2004) Constituency building in multimember districts: Collusion or conflict? The Journal of Politics 66, 136–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, BF, Escobar-Lemmon, MC, Jones, BS, Jones, MP and Taylor-Robinson, MM (2004) Vote-seeking incentives and legislative representation in six presidential democracies. The Journal of Politics 66, 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Luca, M, Jones, MP and Tula, MI (2002) Back rooms or ballot boxes? Candidate nomination in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 35, 413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, AC and Hainmueller, J (2009) MPs for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics. American Political Science Review 103, 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, AC, Fowler, A, Hainmueller, J, Hall, AB and Snyder, JM (2015) On the validity of the regression discontinuity design for estimating electoral effects: New evidence from over 40,000 close races. American Journal of Political Science 59, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, RS and Titiunik, R (2015) Using regression discontinuity to uncover the personal incumbency advantage. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feierherd, G (2019) How mayors hurt their presidential ticket: Party brands and incumbency spillovers in Brazil. The Journal of Politics. doi: 10.1086/705742.Google Scholar
Fenno, RF (1978) Home Style: House Members in their Districts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fiva, JH and Smith, DM (2018) Political dynasties and the incumbency advantage in party-centered environments. American Political Science Review 112, 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiva, JH, Halse, AH and Smith, DM (2019) Does local representation matter? Unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, O (2014) Shades of brown and green: Party effects in proportional election systems. Journal of the European Economic Association 12, 1361–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A and Hall, AB (2017) Long-term consequences of election results. British Journal of Political Science 47, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, S and Piscopo, JM (2008) Gender quotas and women's substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender 4, 393–425.Google Scholar
Franceschet, S and Piscopo, JM (2014) Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 47, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukumoto, K and Matsuo, A (2015) The effects of election proximity on participatory shirking: The staggered-term chamber as a laboratory. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40, 599–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervasoni, C (2010) A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics 62, 302–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, MA and Picci, L (2015) Incumbency effects under proportional representation: Leaders and backbenchers in the postwar Italian Chamber of Deputies. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40, 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, B and Selb, P (2009) A fully general index of political competition. Electoral Studies 28, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, M, Lacalle, M and Micozzi, JP (2013) Does women's presence change legislative behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007. Journal of Politics in Latin America 5, 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, MP, Saiegh, S, Spiller, PT and Tommasi, M (2002) Amateur legislators—professional politicians: The consequences of party-centered electoral rules in a federal system. American Journal of Political Science 46, 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, C and Rekkas, M (2012) Incumbency advantages in the Canadian parliament. Canadian Journal of Economics 45, 1560–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, YP (2015) Pork-barreling without reelection? Evidence from the Mexican congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, M (2015) Corruption and the incumbency disadvantage: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Politics 77, 928–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, M and Titiunik, R (2017) The incumbency curse: Weak parties, term limits, and unfulfilled accountability. American Political Science Review 111, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotakorpi, K, Poutvaara, P and Terviö, M (2017) Returns to office in national and local politics: A bootstrap method and evidence from Finland. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 33, 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, DS (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics 142, 675–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llaudet, E (2014) How parties help their incumbents win: Evidence from Spain. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lodola, G (2009) La estructura subnacional de las carreras políticas en Argentina y Brasil. Desarrollo Económico 49, 247–286.Google Scholar
Lucardi, A (2019) The effect of district magnitude on electoral outcomes. Evidence from two natural experiments in Argentina. British Journal of Political Science 49, 557–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucardi, A and Micozzi, JP (2016) The effect of the electoral cycle on legislators' career strategies. Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41, 811–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucardi, A and Rosas, G (2016) Is the incumbent curse the incumbent's fault? Strategic behavior and negative incumbency effects in young democracies. Electoral Studies 44, 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, DR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Meserve, SA, Pemstein, D and Bernhard, WT (2009) Political ambition and legislative behavior in the European Parliament. Journal of Politics 71, 1015–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micozzi, JP (2009) The Electoral Connection in Multi-Level Systems with Non-Static Ambition: Linking Political Careers and Legislative Performance in Argentina (Ph.D. dissertation). Houston: Rice University.Google Scholar
Micozzi, JP (2013) Does electoral accountability make a difference? Direct elections, career ambition, and legislative performance in the Argentine Senate. The Journal of Politics 75, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micozzi, JP (2014 a) Alliance for progress? Multilevel ambition and patterns of cosponsorship in the Argentine House. Comparative Political Studies 47, 1186–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micozzi, JP (2014 b) From house to home: Strategic bill drafting in multilevel systems with non-static ambition. Journal of Legislative Studies 20, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, S, Nacif, B (eds) (2002) Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, LM (2018) Disloyal brokers and weak parties. American Journal of Political Science 62, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, C and Rennó, L (2013) “Should I stay or should I go?” Explaining political ambition by electoral success in Brazil. Journal of Politics in Latin America 5, 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querubín, P (2016) Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11, 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remington, T (2008) Patronage and the party of power: President–parliament relations under Vladimir Putin. Europe-Asia Studies 60, 959–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, G and Langston, J (2011) Gubernatorial effects on the voting behavior of national legislators. The Journal of Politics 73, 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, DJ (2003) Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, JA (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand MacNally.Google Scholar
Shepsle, KA and Weingast, BR (1987) The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review 81, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieberer, U and Müller, WC (2017) Aiming higher: The consequences of progressive ambition among MPs in European parliaments. European Political Science Review 9, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torre, JC (2003) Los huérfanos de la política de partidos. Sobre los alcances y la naturaleza de la crisis de representación partidaria. Desarrollo Económico 42, 647–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tow, A (N.d) Atlas Electoral de Andy Tow. Available online at http://towsa.com/wordpress/Google Scholar
Treul, SA (2009) Ambition and party loyalty in the U.S. Senate. American Politics Research 37, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uppal, Y (2009) The disadvantaged incumbents: Estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures. Public Choice 138, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Micozzi and Lucardi Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IK3DGT
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Micozzi and Lucardi supplementary material

Micozzi and Lucardi supplementary material

Download Micozzi and Lucardi supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.4 MB