Skip to main content Accessibility help

Economic Policy Voting and Incumbency: Unemployment in Western Europe*

  • Ruth Dassonneville (a1) and Michael S. Lewis-Beck (a2)


The economic voting literature has been dominated by the incumbency-oriented hypothesis, in which voters reward or punish governments at the ballot box according to the nation's economic performance. The alternative (policy-oriented) hypothesis, in which voters favor parties that are closest to their issue position(s), has been neglected in this literature. This article explores policy voting with respect to an archetypal economic policy issue—unemployment. Voters who favor lower unemployment should tend to vote for left parties, since they “own” the issue. Examining a large time-series cross-sectional pool of Western European nations, this study finds some evidence for economic policy voting. However, it is conditioned by incumbency. According to varied tests, left incumbents experience a net electoral cost if the unemployment rate climbs. Incumbency, then, serves to break any natural economic policy advantage that might accrue to the left due to the issue of unemployment.



Hide All

Ruth Dassonneville is a PhD student of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) at the Centre for Citizenship and Democracy, University of Leuven, Parkstraat 45 – box 3602, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium ( Michael S Lewis-Beck is F. Wendell Miller Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States (



Hide All
Allison, Paul D. 2009. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Anderson, Theodore W.Hsiao, Cheng. 1982. ‘Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data’. Journal of Econometrics 18(1):4782.
Arellano, ManuelBond, Stephen. 1991. ‘Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations’. Review of Economic Studies 58(2):277297.
Arellano, ManuelBover, Olympia. 1995. ‘Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models’. Journal of Econometrics 68(1):2951.
Arnesen, Sveinung. 2012. ‘Forecasting Norwegian Elections: Out of Work and Out of Office’. International Journal of Forecasting 28(4):789796.
Bell, Andrew, Jones, Kelvyn. 2012. Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel-Data: University of Bristol.
Blundell, RichardBond, Stephen. 1998. ‘Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Moments’. Journal of Econometrics 87(1):115143.
Butler, DavidStokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan.
Dassonneville, RuthHooghe, Marc. 2012. ‘Election Forecasting under Opaque Conditions: A Model for Francophone Belgium, 1981–2010’. International Journal of Forecasting 28(4):777788.
Döring, Holger, Manow, Philip. 2012. Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov): An Infrastructure for Empirical Information on Parties, Elections and Governments in Modern Democracies 2011. Available from Accessed November 2012.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Duch, Raymond M. 2007. ‘Comparative Studies of the Economy and the Vote’. In Encyclopedia of Comparative Politics, edited by Carlos Boix and Susan Stokes, 805844. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. ‘The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Southern Europe’. Journal of European Social Policy 6(1):1737.
Gallagher, Michael. 2012. Electoral Systems Website. Available from Accessed December 2012.
Goodhart, Charles A.E.Bhansali, Rajendra J.. 1970. ‘Political Economy’. Political Studies 18(1):43106.
Hellwig, Timothy T. 2010. ‘Elections and the Economy’. In Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and Pippa Norris, 184201. London: Sage.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Nadeau, Richard. 2009. ‘Obama and the Economy in 2008’. PS: Political Science and Politics 42(3):479483.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Nadeau, Richard. 2011. ‘Economic Voting Theory: Testing New Dimensions’. Electoral Studies 30(2):288294.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Nadeau, Richard, Foucault, Martial forthcoming. The Compleat Economic Voter: New Evidence from the UK. British Journal of Political Science.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’. Annual Review of Political Sciences 3(1):183219.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Stegmaier, Mary. 2007. ‘Economic Models of Voting’. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingeman, 518537. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Magalhães, Pedro C., Aguiar-Conraria, LuísLewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2012. ‘Forecasting Spanish Elections’. International Journal of Forecasting 28(4):769776.
Norpoth, Helmuth. 1996. ‘The Economy and Elections’. In Comparative Democratic Elections, edited by Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and Pippa Norris, 299318. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Pacek, Alexander C.Radcliff, Benjamin. 1995. ‘Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis’. British Journal of Political Science 25(1):137143.
Pacek, Alexander C.Radcliff, Benjamin. 1999. ‘Economics and the Left Party Vote in Scandinavia: A Cross-National Analysis’. Scandinavian Political Studies 22(4):295306.
Petrocik, John R. 1996. ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’. American Journal of Political Science 40(3):825850.
Rattinger, Hans. 1991. ‘Unemployment and Elections in West Germany’. In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, edited by Helmuth Norpoth, Michael S. Lewis-Beck and Jean-Dominique Lafay, 4962. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Roodman, David. 2009. ‘Practitioners’ Corner. A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71(1):135158.
Stegmaier, MaryLewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2009. ‘Learning the Economic Vote: Hungarian Forecasts, 1998–2010’. Politics & Policy 37(4):769780.
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’. American Political Science Review 57(2):368377.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2012. Voter Turnout Data. Available from Accessed November 2012.
International Monetary Fund. 2012. World Economic Outlook Database 2012. Available from Accessed November 2012.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Dassonneville and Lewis-Beck Dataset



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed