Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T15:30:02.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The multiple landscapes of Biedjovággi: Ontological conflicts on indigenous land

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2021

Britt Kramvig Open the ORCID record for Britt Kramvig [Opens in a new window]  and
Dag Avango Open the ORCID record for Dag Avango [Opens in a new window]
Britt Kramvig*
Affiliation:
Department of Tourism and Northern Studies, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Dag Avango
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology
*
Author for correspondence: Britt Kramvig, Email: britt.kramvig@uit.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we engage with environmental conflicts on indigenous land through a focus on an attempt to gain social licence to reopen and operate the Biedjovággi mine in Guovdageainnu/Kautokeino in Sápmi, Norway. We argue that mining prospects bring forth ontological conflicts concerning land use, as well as ways to know the landscape and the envisioned future that the land holds. It is a story of a conflict between two different ways of knowing. The paper explores the Sámi landscape through different concepts, practices and stories. We then contrast this to the way the same landscape is understood and narrated by a mining company, through the programmes and documents produced according to the Norwegian law and standards. We follow Ingold’s argument that the Sámi landscape practices are taskscapes, where places, times and tasks are interconnected. These were not acknowledged in the plans and documents of the mining company. We conclude by addressing the tendency of extractive industries to reduce different landscapes in ways that fit with modern understandings, which oppose culture to nature.

Keywords

SápmiOntological conflictsIndigenousLandscapeExtractive industriesReindeer herdingMiningArctic
Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 57 , 2021 , e35
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asdal, K. (2015). What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asdal, K. & Jordheim, H. (2018). Texts on the move: Textuality and historicity revisited. History and Theory, 57(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjaminsen, T., Reinert, H., Sjaastad, E. & Sara, M. N. (2015). Misreading the Arctic landscape: A political ecology of reindeer, carrying capacities, and overstocking in Finnmark, Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 69(4), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2015.1031274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrøm, G. & Joks, S. (2012). Gull og Grønne skoger (Gold and Green forests) Ságat 5th June.Google Scholar
Bjørklund, I. (2016). Fra formynder til forhandler: Om inngrep, konsekvensanalyser og balansert sameksistens. In Benjaminsen, T., Gaup Eira, I. M. and Sara, M.N. (Eds.), Samisk reindrift Norske myter (pp. 177–195). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Blaser, M. (2009). Political ontology Cultural Studies without ‘cultures’? Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaser, M. (2013). Notes towards a political ontology of ‘environmental’ conflicts. In Green, L. (Ed.), Contested ecologies: Nature and knowledge (pp. 13–27). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Brattland, C., Kramvig, B. & Verran, H. (2018). Doing indigenous methodologies: Towards a practice of the ‘careful partial participant’. Ab-Original: Journal of Indigenous Studies and First Nations’ and First Peoples’ Cultures, 2, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buljo, K. M. (2002). Mitt kulturlandskap. Dieđut nr. 1/2002. Sámi Instituhtta.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gaski, H. (1997). Sami Culture in a New Era: The Norwegian Sami Experience. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji.Google Scholar
Gullestad, M. (2001). Kitchen-table Society: A Case Study of the Family Life and Friendships of Young Working-class Mothers in Urban Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Helander-Renvall, E. (2009). Animism, personhood and the nature of reality: Sami Perspectives. Polar Record, 46(236), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247409990040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian. (2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, M. S. (2012). Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J. L. (2008). Ways of Walking Ethnography and Practice on Foot. Aldershot, Enland: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jernsletten, J. (2010). Resources for indigenous theology from a Sami perspective. The Ecumenical Review, 62(4), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jernsletten, K. (2012). The hidden children of Eve: Sámi poetics guovtti ilmmi gaskkas. Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., Masloboev, V., Hossain, K., Nygaard, V., Petrétei, A. & Vinogradova, S. (2015). Legal protection of Sami traditional livelihoods from the adverse impacts of mining: A comparison of the level of protection enjoyed by Sami in their four home states. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 6(1), 11–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramvig, B. (2015). Gifts of dreams, connecting to Sami epistemic practice. In Miller, B. (Eds.), Traditional Sami health and healing practices (pp. 183–209). Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Lassila, M. M. (2018). Mapping mineral resources in a living land: Sami mining resistance in Ohcejohka, northern Finland. Geoforum, 96, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. & Joks, S. (2019). Indigeneity, science and difference: Notes on the politics of how. Science, Technology & Human Values, 44(3): 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439I879392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, S. (2015). Gull, Gråstein og Grums: Omstridde gruver. Karasjok: Davvi Girji. Retrieved from http://www.gruve.info/a1.htm Google Scholar
Magnussen, T. & Dale, B. (2018). The municipal No to Mining: The Case Concerning the Reopening of the Biedjovaggi Gold Mine in Guovdageainnu Municipality, Norway. In Dale, B., Bay Larsen, I. & Skorstad, B. (Eds.), The Will to Drill – Mining in Arctic Communities. Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_9 Google Scholar
Merriman, P. & Jones, R. (2017). Nations, materialities and affects. Progress in Human Geography, 41(5), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516649453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-believe Space: Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NRK Sápmi (2013, 12th February). Gollegiisa – skattkammeret [documentary] https://tv.nrk.no/program/SAPR67002112/gollegiisa-skattkammeret Google Scholar
Oskal, N. (1995). Det rette, det gode og reinlykken. Doctoral dissertation, UiT: The Arctic University of Norway.Google Scholar
Østmo, L. & Law, J. (2018). Mis/translation, colonialism, and environmental conflict. Environmental Humanities. 10(2): 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7156782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambøll (2011/2012). Forslag til Planprogram [Suggestion to Planprogram]: Planprogram for reguleringsplan med konsekvensutredning for etablering av gruvedrift i Biedjovággi, Kautokeino og Nordreisa Kommune. Alta: Arctic Gold & Rambøll.Google Scholar
Riseth, J. Å., Solbakken, I., & Kitti, H. (2010). Naturbruk i Kautokeino: Fastboendes bruk av Meahcci i Kautokeino kommune og konsekvenser ved etablering av naturvernområder. Kautokeino: Sami Allaskuvla.Google Scholar
Rundskriv (2014). Retningslinjer for innsigelse i plansaker. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/262ead42d58f4404905659bff0a2e02e/retningslinjer_innsigelse_plansaker_pbl.pdf Google Scholar
Sara, M. K. (2013). Siida ja siidastallan, being siida – On the relationship between siida tradition and continuation of the siida system. Doctoral Dissertation, UiT: The Arctic Universitetet of Norway.Google Scholar
Schanche, A. (2002). Meahcci, den samiske utmarka. In Andersen, S. (Ed.), Samiske landskap og Agenda 21: Kultur, næring, miljøvern og demokrati (pp. 156–170). Guovdageaidnu/Kautokeino: Sámi instituhtta.Google Scholar
Somby, L. I., Idivuoma, M., Manndal, R., & Sápmi, N. R. K. (2013, 13th February). Vurderer å bryte med Arctic Gold. NRK Sápmi. Retrieved from: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/vurderer-a-bryte-dialogen-1.10911655 Google Scholar
Stephansen, S. (2010, 12th February). Store mineralmuligheter i nord. Retrieved from: http://www.nussir.no/media/2010/2010-12-02%20%20Forskningsraadet%20-%20Store%20mineralmuligheter%20i%20nord.pdf Google Scholar
Thift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory, Space, Politics Affect. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermes (2019, 1th Mars). Det grønne skiftet blir til grønn kolonialisme. ABC Nyheter. Retrieved from: https://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/politikk/2019/03/01/195556940/det-gronne-skiftet-blir-til-gronn-kolonialisme Google Scholar
Verran, H. (2013). Engagements between disparate knowledge traditions: Toward doing difference generatively and in good faith. In Green, L. (Ed.), Contested Ecologies: Dialogues between the South on Nature and Knowledge (pp. 141–162). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Vuolab & Gaup (NRK Sápmi) (2013, 16th Desember). Trist og forunderlig NRK Sápmi. Retrived from: https://www.nrk.no/sapmi/arctic-gold-skuffet-over-gruve-nei-1.11421746 Google Scholar
Ween, G. & Lien, M. (2012). Decolonialization in the Arctic? Nature practices and land rights in the Norwegian High North. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 7(1), 93–109.Google Scholar