Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:56:31.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Japan's post-war Ainu policy. Why the Japanese Government has not recognised Ainu indigenous rights?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2012

Hiroshi Maruyama
Hiroshi Maruyama*
Affiliation:
Muroran Institute of Technology, 050-8585 Mizumoto 27-1, Muroran, Hokkaido, Japan (maruyama@mmm.muroran-it.ac.jp)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1946, the Ainu Association of Hokkaido was established by the Ainu to reclaim their lands. The 1970s and 80s saw that the association successfully put pressure on the Hokkaido Prefectural Government to take social welfare measures for the improvement of their life and make a new law counter to the Hokkaido Former Aborigines Protection Act. In 1997 the Japanese Government enacted the so-called New Ainu Law. However, it is totally different from the original draft made by the Ainu. The law does not designate the Ainu as indigenous people. Further, it is outstripped by the decision of Nibutani Dam Case that, for the first time in Japanese history, recognised Ainu right to culture and indigenousness in Japanese territory. In 2008 the Japanese Government finally recognised the Ainu as indigenous people in the wake of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. However, the Ainu do not yet have any indigenous rights. This note chronologically outlines Japan's post-war Ainu policy, and moreover explores who and what has influenced Ainu policy and the law.

Type
Note
Information
Polar Record , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 204 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bukh, A. 2010. Ainu identity and Japan's identity: the struggle for subjectivity. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 28 (2): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diene, D. 2006. Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. United Nations: United Nations Commission on Human Rights: mission to Japan. (UN Document E/CN.4/2006/16/Add.2/2401/2006)(URL:http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/103/96/PDF/G0610396.pdf?OpenElement (accessed 9 June 2012))Google Scholar
Hokkaido Prefectural Government. 2006. Report of the survey of the actual conditions of life for the Ainu in Hokkaido. URL: http://www.pref.hokkaido.lg.jp/ks/ass/grp/H18houkokusyo.pdf (accessed17 May 2012)Google Scholar
IWGIA (International Work Group of Indigenous Affairs). 2001. The indigenous world: 2000–2001. Copenhagen: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri.Google Scholar
IWGIA (International Work Group of Indigenous Affairs). 2003. The indigenous world: 2002–2003. Copenhagen: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri.Google Scholar
IWGIA (International Work Group of Indigenous Affairs). 2009. The indigenous world: 2009. Copenhagen: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri.Google Scholar
Kaizawa, K. 1999. Negai [Request]. In: Kayano, S., and Tanaka, H. (editors). Nibutani damu saiban no kiroku [Documents of the Nibutani Dam Case]. Tokyo: Sanseido. 29–33.Google Scholar
Kaizawa, T. 2010. Ainu, waga Jinsei [Ainu, my life]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, T. 1999. Ainu ties with ancient cultures of Northeast Asia. In: Fitzhugh, W.W., and Dubreuil, C.O. (editors). Ainu: spirit of a northern people. Los Angeles: Perpetua Press. 9–27.Google Scholar
Larson, E., Johnson, Z., and Murphy, M.. 2008. Emerging indigenous governance: Ainu rights at the intersection of global norms and domestic institutions. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 33 (1): 33–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, H. 2012. Ainu landowners’ struggle for justice and the illegitimacy of the Nibutani Dam project in Hokkaido, Japan. International Community Law Review 14: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, C. 2008. After the Ainu Shinpo: the United Nations and the indigenous people of Japan. New Voices: A Journal for Emerging Scholars of Japanese Studies in Australia 2: 201–219 (Sydney: The Japan Foundation).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddle, R. 1996. Race, resistance and the Ainu of Japan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siddle, R. 2003. The limits to citizenship in Japan: multiculturalism, indigenous rights and the Ainu. Citizenship Studies 7 (4): 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, G. 2008. Subject, object and active participant: the Ainu, law, and legal mobilization. Indigenous Law Journal 7 (1): 127–167.Google Scholar
Tsunemoto, T. 2010. Ainu bunka sinkoho no igi to ainu minzoku seisaku no kadai [Significance of the New Ainu Law and problems with the Ainu policy]. In: Hokkaido University Center for Ainu and Indigenous Studies (editor). Ainu kenkyu no genzai to mirai [The present and future of Ainu studies]. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press: 211–222.Google Scholar
Tsunemoto, T. 2010. Senjuminzoku no kenri ni kansuru kokusairengo sengen no saitaku to sonoigi [Adoption of the UNDRIP and the meaning]. In: Hokkaido University Center for Ainu and Indigenous Studies (editor). Ainu kenkyu no genzai to mirai [The present and future of Ainu studies]. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press. 193–210.Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Committee. 2008. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee in Japan. (UN Document CCPR /C/JPN/CO/5/1812/2008) (URL: http://daccess-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G09/401/08/PDF/G0940108.pdf?OpenElement (accessed 9 June 2012)).Google Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Division for Social Policy and Development, Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues). 2009. State of the world's indigenous peoples. New York: United Nations. (URL: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP_web.pdf (accessed 9 June 2012))Google Scholar
UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. 2010. Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in Japan. (UN Document. CERD/C/JPN/CO/3–6/0604/2010) (URL: http://daccess-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/415/82/PDF/G1041582.pdf?OpenElement (accessed 9 June 2012)).Google Scholar
Web-magazine Kamui Mintara. 1990. URL: http://kamuimintara.net/detail.php?rskey=36199001t01 (accessed 15 June 2012).Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M. 2009. A view on the report by the Advisory Council for Future Ainu policy. URL: http://www.jasca.org/news/past/ainu2.html (accessed 17 May 2012).Google Scholar
Yamashita, S. 1996. A view on the report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Ainu policy. URL: http://www.jasca.org/news/past/utari.html (accessed17 May 2012).Google Scholar
Yoshida, K. 1989. Ainu jinkoshi [History of the Ainu population]. Bulletin of the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Nihon University 37: 279–301.Google Scholar