Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:53:29.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of soil microstructure on hydraulic properties of hydrocarbon-contaminated freezing ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

T.L. White  and
P.J. Williams
T.L. White
Affiliation:
Geotechnical Science Laboratories, Carleton University, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada
P.J. Williams
Affiliation:
Geotechnical Science Laboratories, Carleton University, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The significance of the thermodynamic relations of ice and water within the paniculate and porous soil medium has been widely demonstrated in recent decades. The existence of unfrozen water along with ice at temperatures below 0°C, because of capillary and mineral surface forces, is responsible for the specific thermal, mechanical, and hydraulic properties of soils exposed to seasonal or perennial freezing. The introduction of a hydrocarbon contaminant into this dynamic porous medium has significant consequences for the thermodynamics of the unfrozen water–ice interactions. Techniques recently developed have allowed examination of microstructures of soils exposed to freezing. It has been shown that freeze–thaw cycles produce complex changes in particle aggregation and pore space distribution, which in turn affect soil water energy. An examination of the microstructure of a hydrocarbon-contaminated, frostaffected soil revealed differences in morphology from that of similar but uncontaminated samples. These differences are in turn responsible for differences in hydraulic conductivity between uncontaminated and contaminated freezing soils.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 35 , Issue 192 , January 1999 , pp. 25 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chamberlain, E.J. 1990. Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on the permeability and macrostructure of soils. In: Proceedings, International symposium on frozen soil, impacts on agricultural range and forest lands. Spokane, WA: US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL Special Report 90–1).Google Scholar
Geotechnical Science Laboratories. 1994. Study of movement of hydrocarbons through freezing and thawing soils (Dew Line cleanup). Ottawa: Carleton University, Geotechnical Science Laboratories (Final report: Internal report 67 (1)).Google Scholar
Greschichev, S., Pavlov, A.V., and Poriornarev, V.V.. 1992. Changes in microstructures of fine-grained soils due to freezing. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 3 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladanyi, B., and Shen, M.. 1993. Freezing pressure development on a buried chilled pipeline. In: Phukan, A. (editor). Frost in geotechnical engineering. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema: 23–33.Google Scholar
Murphy, C.P. 1986. Thin section preparation of soils and sediments. Berkhampstead: AB Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Othman, M.A., and Benson, C.H.. 1993. Effect of freezethaw on the hydraulic conductivity and morphology of compacted clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 30: 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandow, S.F., and Cherry, J.A.. 1996. Dense chlorinated solvents and other DNAPLs in ground water: history, behaviour and remediation. Waterloo, Ontario: Waterloo Press.Google Scholar
Van Vliet-Lanöe, B. 1985. Frost effects in soils. In: Boardman, J. (editor). Soils and Quaternary landscape evolution. John Wiley & Sons: 117–158.Google Scholar
White, T.L. 1992. Cryogenic alteration of a frost-susceptible soil. Unpublished MSc thesis. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
White, T.L. 1993. Microstructural genesis of a frost-susceptible soil adjacent to a buried chilled pipeline. In: Williams, P.J. (editor). Gas pipelines, oil pipelines and civil engineering in Arctic climates: proceeedings of seminar held in Caen and Paris, France. Ottawa: Carleton University, Geotechnical Science Laboratories: 73–91.Google Scholar
White, T.L. 1996. Cryogenic alteration of clay and silt microstructure: implications for geotechnical properties. Unpublished PhD thesis. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
White, T.L., and Coutard, J.P.. 1998. Modification of silt microstructure by hydrocarbon contamination in freezing ground. Polar Record 35 (192): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.L., and Fox, C.A.. 1997. Comparison of cryogenic features dominant in soils affected by permafrost with those produced experimentally. In: Proceedings, 10th international working meeting on soilmicromorphology. Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
White, T.L., and Williams, P.J.. 1994. Cryogenic alteration of frost-susceptible soils. In: Proceedings, 7th international symposium on freezing ground. Nancy, France: 17–24.Google Scholar
White, T.L., and Williams, P.J.. 1996. The role of microstructure – geotechnical properties of freezing soils. Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on thermal engineering and science for cold regions. Ottawa: University of Ottawa: 415–426.Google Scholar
Williams, P.J., Riseborough, D.W., and Smith, M.W.. 1993. The France–Canada joint study of deformation of an experimental pipe line by differential frost heave. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering 3 (1): 56–60.Google Scholar
Williams, P.J., and Smith, M.W.. 1991. The frozen Earth: fundamentals of geocryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yershov, E.D. 1998. General geocryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar