Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T03:00:50.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological investigations in Alaska since 1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Helge Larsen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In almost any branch of science, periods of slow and steady progress or stagnation alternate with periods of rapid development caused by new discoveries or inventions, by the introduction of new methods, or by other accelerating factors. Eskimo archaeology is no exception to this rule and, even if only thirty years have passed since archaeologists first began to search for Eskimo relics, it is already possible to distinguish four periods of development, separated by short interludes of relatively little activity. Of these four periods only the last two fall within the scope of this article, but since the understanding of recent developments in Eskimo archaeology presupposes a knowledge of previous work in that field it is necessary to summarize what was accomplished in the first two periods.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 6 , Issue 45 , January 1953 , pp. 593 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected Bibliography

Giddings, James L. Jr, Dated sites on the Kobuk River, Alaska. Tree-Ring Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1942, p. 2–8.Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. Jr, Dated Eskimo ruins of an inland zone. American Antiquity, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1944, p. 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, James L. Jr, Chronology of the Kobuk-Kotzebue sites. Tree-Ring Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1948, p. 26–32.Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. Jr, Early flint horizons on the north Bering Sea coast. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1949, p. 85–90.Google Scholar
Giddincs, James L. Jr, The Denbigh Flint Complex. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1951, p. 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, William. Archaeology in the Brooks Range of Alaska. American Antiquity, Vol. 17, No. 1, Part 1, 1951, p. 52–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Helge. Archaeological investigations in southwestern Alaska. American Antiquity, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1950, p. 177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labsen, Helge. De dansk-amerikanske Alaska-ekspeditioner 1949–50. Geografisk Tidsskrift, Bd. 51, 1951, p. 63–93.Google Scholar
Larsen, Helge and Rainey, Froelich G. Ipiutak and the Arctic Whale Hunting Culture. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 42, 1948.Google Scholar
Laughlin, W. S.Notes on an Aleutian core and blade industry. American Antiquity, Vol. 17, No. 1, Part 1, 1951, p. 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, W. S. and Marsh, G. H.A new view of the history of the Aleutians. Arctic, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1951, p. 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, Wendell. Pottery from Hooper Bay village, Alaska. American Antiquity, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1952, p. 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, Froelich G.Eskimo prehistory: the Okvik site on the Punuk Islands. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 37, Part 4, 1941, p. 453–569.Google Scholar
Solecki, Ralph S.Archaeology and geology in northwestern Alaska. The Earth Science Digest, Vol. 4, No. 7, 1950, p. 3–7.Google Scholar
Solecki, Ralph S.Notes on two archaeological discoveries in northern Alaska, 1950. American Antiquity, Vol. 17, No. 1, Part 1, 1951, p. 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Raymond M. Notes on the archaeology of the Utukok River, northwestern Alaska. American Antiquity, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar