Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:38:34.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antarctica in museums: the Mawson collections in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Barbara Wheeler  and
Linda Young
Barbara Wheeler
Affiliation:
Cultural Heritage Management, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Linda Young
Affiliation:
Cultural Heritage Management, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relics of polar exploration are treasured in the museums of a multitude of nations. In Australia, the focus of most such collections is Sir Douglas Mawson and his expeditions to Antarctica in 1911–14 and 1929–31. The nature of these collections divides into the two large categories of scientific specimens and expedition relics. The latter are spread among Australian and other museums in a distribution that speaks of fascination with the exotic and heroic aspects of the Australasian Antarctic Expedition and the geopolitical ramifications of the British, Australian and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition. The specimens, by contrast, have not been treated well, and although thoroughly documented, may be close to losing their integrity as scientific resources. Both types of material merit the renewed attention of their museum-keepers as resources on the history of Antarctica.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 36 , Issue 198 , July 2000 , pp. 193 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australasian Antarctic Expedition Scientific Reports. 1916–1947. Series A: Geology; Series B: Meteorology; Series C: Zoology and botany. Sydney: NSW Government Printer; Adelaide: South Australian Government Printer.Google Scholar
Australian Museum Archives: AMS 123: Papers re Mawson's Australian Antarctic Expeditions, 1911–1936.Google Scholar
Australian Museum Archives: AMS 235: Central correspondence files, 1949–1984.Google Scholar
Australian Museum Archives: AN93/22: Anthropology Department, Mawson file, 1977–1993.Google Scholar
Australian Museum Magazine. 1924. Australian Museum Magazine 2–3: 85.Google Scholar
Ayres, P. 1999. Mawson: a life. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. G. 1995. Antarctic artefacts: a selective description and annotated catalogue of artefacts in the Mawson Collection at the University of Adelaide. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Innes, M., and Duff, H. (compilers). 1990. Mawson's papers: a guide to the scientific, personal and business papers of Sir Douglas Mawson. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Mawson, D. 1915. The home of the blizzard: being the story of the Australasian Antarctic Expedition, 1911–14. 2 vols. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences. Stockbooks.Google Scholar
National Archives of Australia. Prime Minister's Department file A413/5: BANZARE: General equipment and stores.Google Scholar
National Archives of Australia. Prime Minister's Department file F413/5: BANZARE: Disposal of scientific equipment.Google Scholar
Price, A. G. 1962. The winning of Australian Antarctica: Mawson's BANZARE voyages 1929–31. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, P. D. 2000. Marine mammals of the Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–14 (AAE) and the British, Australian and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition 1929–31 (BANZARE). ANARE Report 141.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B. 1993. The meanings of Sir Douglas Mawson's Antarctic object collections. Unpublished honours thesis. Canberra: University of Canberra.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B., and Young, L.. 1999–2000. Collecting Mawson: the musealisation of heroic adventure and geopolitical science. Public History Review 8.Google Scholar