Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T04:57:01.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hungarian cola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2020

Michael Hammond
Michael Hammond*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stowell (1979) argues that an intermediate level of structure between foot and word tree is necessary: superfeet or cola. Cola are metrical constituents built on the output of footing. Stowell's argument is based on the accentual systems of Passamaquoddy and Seneca. However, in both cases, the analysis is for one reason or another questionable. First, P. LeSourd (personal communication) has suggested that the Passamaquoddy data are more complex than the sample Stowell presents, which undercuts his account. (Stowell's data are drawn from LeSourd's fieldwork.) Second, the Seneca analysis rests on the assumption that bounded and unbounded feet cannot cooccur in the same language – not a necessary component of metrical theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Phonology , Volume 4 , May 1987 , pp. 265 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The data reported on here have been provided by E. Moravcsik. Thanks to D. Archangeli, B. Hayes, G. Iverson, P. Lesourd and E. Moravcsik for helpful feedback.

References

Halle, M & -R, J. Vergnaud (in preparation). An essay on stress.Google Scholar
Hammond, M (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Revised version distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hammond, M (1986). The obligatory-branching parameter in metrical theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4. 185–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B (1985). Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. BLS II. 429–446.Google Scholar
Liberman, M & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Stowell, T (1979). Stress systems of the world, unite! MIT Working Papers in Linguistics I. 51–76.Google Scholar