Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:11:24.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy (1992). Current morphology. (Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge. Pp. xiii + 289.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Richard Sproat
Richard Sproat
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , August 1992 , pp. 353 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar. Boston: Ginn. 184–221.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. & Gilligan, G. (1985). The suffixing preference: a processing explanation. Linguistics 23. 723–758.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.-M. & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word-formation. LI 4. 3–16.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1983). Argument linking and compounds in English. LI 14. 251–286.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1982). Formal problems in Semitic morphology and phonology. PhD thesis (1979), MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. NLLT 8. 209–284.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Siegel, M. (1978). A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. LI 9. 199–260.Google Scholar
Sproat, R. (1985). On deriving the lexicon. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Ward, G., Sproat, R. & McKoon, G. (1991). A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Lg 67. 439–474.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1981). On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. LI 12. 245–274.Google Scholar