Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T01:34:38.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wormwholes: A Commentary on K. F. Schaffner's “Genes, Behavior, and Developmental Emergentism”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Scott F. Gilbert  and
Erik M. Jorgensen
Scott F. Gilbert*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Martin Biological Laboratories, Swarthmore College
Erik M. Jorgensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Caenorhabditis elegans was chosen and modified to be an organism that would facilitate a reductionist program for neurogenetics, recent research has provided evidence for properties that are emergent from the neurons. While neurogenetic advances have been made using C. elegans which may be useful in explaining human neurobiology, there are severe limitations on C. elegans to explain any significant human behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 259 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Send requests for reprints to Scott F. Gilbert, Department of Biology, Martin Biological Laboratories, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA; or Erik M. Jorgensen, Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112–0840.

References

Block, Ned (1995), “How hereditability misleads about race”, Cognition 56: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jennifer R., Ye, Hong, Bronson, Roderick T., Dikkes, Pieter, and Greenberg, Michael E. (1996), “A defect in nurturing in mice lacking the intermediate early gene fosB”, Cell 86: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Gilbert (1992), Individual Development and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. (1997), Modest Witness@Second Millenium. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard F. (1997), “Journal journalism”, Current Biology 7: 458.10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00230-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, Evelyn F. (1992), “Nature, Nurture, and the Human Genome Project”, in Kevles, D. J., and Hood, L. (eds.), The Code of Codes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (1970), “Race and intelligence”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 26(3): 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (1992), Biology as Ideology. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Mann, Charles C. (1994), “Behavioral genetics in transition”, Science 264: 1686–1689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelkin, Dorothy and Lindee, M. Susan (1995), The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Schnabel, Ralf (1997), “Why does a nematode have an invariant cell lineage?”, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 8: 341–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sengupta, Piali, Chou, Joseph H., and Bargmann, Cornelia I. (1996), “odr-10 encodes a seven transmembrane domain olfactory receptor required for responses to the odorant diacetyl”, Cell 84: 899–909.10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81068-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, Alfred I. and Sarkar, Sahotra (1992), “The Human Genome Project: Has blind reductionism gone too far?”, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 35: 220–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, Samuel C. III. (1991), “True figures: Metaphor, social relations, and the sorites,” in David R. Hiley, James F. Bohman, and Richard Shusterman (eds.), The Interpretive Turn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
Whitney, Glayde (1995), quoted in “Specter at the feast”, Science 269: 35.Google Scholar