Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T22:41:07.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Standard Model as a Philosophical Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Edward MacKinnon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are two opposing traditions in contemporary quantum field theory (QFT). Mainstream Lagrangian QFT led to and supports the standard model of particle interactions. Algebraic QFT seeks to provide a rigorous consistent mathematical foundation for field theory, but cannot accommodate the local gauge interactions of the standard model. Interested philosophers face a choice. They can accept algebraic QFT on the grounds of mathematical consistency and general accord with the semantic conception of theory interpretation. This suggests a rejection of particle ontology. Or they can accept the standard model on the grounds of its established success. This alternative, which I defend, suggests revising philosophical accounts of scientific theory and finding some way of accommodating particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 447 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchholz, Detlev (1998), “Current Trends in Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory”, arXiv: hep-th/981123.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Detlev, and Haag, Rudolf (1999), “The Quest for Understanding in Relativistic Quantum Physics”, arXiv: hep-th/9910243.Google Scholar
Earman, John, and Fraser, Doreen (2006),“Haag's Theorem and Its Implications for the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory”, PhilSci Archive: 2673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Doreen (2006), “The Problem of Theory Choice for the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory”, presentation given at PSA 2006 in Vancouver.Google Scholar
Haag, Rudolf (1992), Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorson, Hans (2001), “Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner”, Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner 68:111–133.Google Scholar
Halvorson, Hans, and Clifton, Rob (2002), “No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories”, No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories 69:1–28.Google Scholar
Halvorson, Hans, and Muger, Michael (2006), “Algebraic Quantum Field Theory”, PhilSci Archive: 2633.Google Scholar
Kaku, Michio (1993), Quantum Field Theory: A Modern Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Edward (forthcoming), Interpreting Physics: Language and the Classical/Quantum Divide.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew (1984), Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Redhead, Michael, and Wagner, Fabian (1998), “Unified Treatment of EPR and Bell Arguments in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory”, arXiv: quant-ph/9802010.Google Scholar
Ruetsche, Laura (2002), “Interpreting Quantum Field Theory”, Interpreting Quantum Field Theory 69:348–378.Google Scholar
Samios, Nicholas (1997), “Early Baryon and Meson Spectroscopy Culminating in the Discovery of the Omega-Minus and Charmed Baryons”, in Hoddeson, Lillian, Brown, Laurie, Riordan, Michael, and Dresden, Max (eds.), The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, David (2001a), “Emergence of Particles from Bosonic Quantum Field Theory”, arXiv: quant-ph/0112149v1.Google Scholar
Wallace, David (2001b), “In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory”, arXiv: quant-ph/0112148.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Steven (1997), “Changing Attitudes and the Standard Model”, in Hoddeson, Lillian, Brown, Laurie, Riordan, Michael, and Dresden, Max (eds.), The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar