Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T01:50:57.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Scope and Limits of Scientific Objectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Joseph F. Hanna
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: first to sketch a framework for classifying a wide range of conceptions of scientific objectivity and second to present and defend a conception of scientific objectivity that fills a neglected niche in the resulting hierarchy of viewpoints. Roughly speaking, the proposed ideal of scientific objectivity is effectiveness in the informal but technical sense of an effective method. Science progresses when “higher levels of communicative discourse” are reached by transforming subjective judgments regarding the generation and reduction of data or the testing of theories into objective decision procedures that are automatic or mechanical.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 339 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I am greatly indebted to the thoughtful, detailed and constructive criticisms of several anonymous referees (covering two rewrites of this paper), who both encouraged me to clarify my views and suggested new sources and ideas that helped me strengthen my arguments. I would also like to thank my colleague, Richard Hall, for many hours of fruitful argument over the question of scientific realism.

References

Brandom, Robert (1994), Making it Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (1992), “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”, Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective 22:597–618.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter (1992), “The Image of Objectivity”, Representations (40): 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1950), “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology 4:20–40.Google Scholar
Freeman, Eugene (1974), “Charles Peirce and Objectivity in Philosophy”, in Schilpp, Paul A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. 1, La Salle, IL: Open Court, 464–482.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter (1997), Image and Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald (2003), “A New Program for Philosophy of Science?”, A New Program for Philosophy of Science? 70:15–21.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1971), Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Joseph (1985), “The Logic of 20th Century Empiricism”, in Rescher, Nicholas (ed.), The Heritage of Logical Positivism. New York: University Press of America, 29–53.Google Scholar
Kourany, Janet (2003), “A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century”, A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century 70:1–14.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1977), “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”, in Kuhn, Thomas, The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth (1995), “Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies”, Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies 104:351–381.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1963), “Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Knowledge”, in Popper, Karl, Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books, 215–250.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl ([1934] 1968), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2d ed. Originally published as Logik der Forschung (Vienna: Julius Springer). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1991), “Solidarity or Objectivity?”, in Rorty, Richard, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–34.Google Scholar