Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:30:50.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Points of View, Scientific Theories and Econometric Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Robert J. Wolfson*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University

Abstract

The relationship between a class of structural forms and a single reduced form econometric model is discussed. These are shown to be empirically equivalent. It is made clear that choice of a particular structural form for estimation, rather than another of the same class, rests on a priori heuristic and computational considerations, not on empirical or logical grounds.

Alternative scientific strategies are discussed briefly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was begun in 1959-60 while the author held a Ford Foundation Faculty Fellowship. Some additional work was done under support by the Office of Naval Research, Contract Nonr 233-02 under task NR 047-003, Management Sciences Research Project, University of California, Los Angeles.

I am indebted to my colleague, John Henning, for his thoughtful remarks. It is unnecessary to add that the responsibility for any errors rests with me.

References

[1] Simon, H. A., “Causal Ordering and Identifiability,” Ch. 3 of Studies in Econometric Method, Cowles Commission Monograph 14 (eds. Hood, W. and Koopmans, T. C.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1953, reprinted in Simon, Models of Man, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[2] Marschak, J., “Statistical Inference in Economics: an Introduction,” Ch. 1 of Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models, Cowles Commission Monograph 10 (ed. Koopmans, T. C.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1950, pp. 150.Google Scholar
[3] Tinbergen, J., Econometrics, Blakiston, New York, 1951, pp. 3941.Google Scholar
[4] Zipf, G. K., Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, 1949.Google Scholar
[5] Rapoport, A., Fights, Games and Debates, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1960.Google Scholar
[6] Rashevsky, N., Mathematical Theory of Human Relations, Principia Press, Evanston, 1947.Google Scholar
[7] Orcutt, G. H., “Toward Partial Redirection of Econometrics,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. XXXIV, 1952, pp. 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Liu, T. C., “A Simple Forecasting Model for the U.S. Economy,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, vol. IV, 1955, pp. 434466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Liu, T. C., “Underidentification, Structural Estimation and Forecasting,” Econometrica, vol. 28, 1960, pp. 855865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Koopmans, T. C., and Hood, W. C., “The Estimation of Simultaneous Linear Economic Relationships,” Ch. VI of Cowles Commission Monograph 14, op. cit.Google Scholar
[11] Theil, H., “Estimation of Parameters of Econometric Models,” Bulletin de L'Institute International de Statistique, vol. 34, pt. 2, 1954, pp. 122129.Google Scholar
[12] Basmann, R. L., “A Generalized Classical Method of Linear Estimation of Coefficients in a Structural Equation,” Econometrica, vol. 25, 1957, pp. 7883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Zellner, A. and Theil, H., “Three-Stage Least-Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations,” Report 6103, Netherlands School of Economics, Econometric Institute, January 10, 1961, Mimeo.Google Scholar