Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:22:20.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Argument by Analogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

P. R. Wilson*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney

Abstract

Conditions are stated under which the “argument by analogy” is consistent with the principle of inverse probability. It is contended that the argument by analogy, in conjunction with a crucial test, has a legitimate place in scientific logic. As an example the astrophysical problem of solar granulation is discussed in detail and other examples are mentioned more briefly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bunge, Mario, Phil. of Sci., 27, 262, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Edmonds, F. N., Astrophys. J., Supp. Series No. 50, 6, 357, 1962.Google Scholar
[3] Hospers, J., An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis (Routledge and Kegan Paul), 1960.Google Scholar
[4] Jeffreys, H., Scientific Inference, (2nd Edit.) (Cambridge University Press), 1957.Google Scholar
[5] Kemeny, J. G., Phil. Rev. 62, 391, 1953.Google Scholar
[6] Leighton, R. B., Noyes, R. W., and Simon, G. W., Astrophys. J., 135, 474, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Minnaert, M., The Sun, ed. Kniper, G. (University of Chicago Press), 1, 173, 1953.Google Scholar
[8] Schwarzschild, M., Astrophys. J. 130, 345, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Wilson, P. R., Monthly Notices R.A.S., 123, 287, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Wilson, P. R., (b) Astrophys. J., 137, 606, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar