Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T03:11:36.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objective Time Flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Storrs McCall
Storrs McCall*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A theory of temporal passage is put forward which is “objective” in the sense that time flow characterizes the universe independently of the existence of conscious beings. The theory differs from Grünbaum's “mind-dependence” theory, and is designed to avoid Grünbaum's criticisms of an earlier theory of Reichenbach's. The representation of temporal becoming is accomplished by the introduction of indeterministic universe-models; each model representing the universe at a time. The models depict the past as a single four-dimensional manifold, and the future as a branched structure of such manifolds. Time flow is relativistic in that it manifests itself in a frame-dependent (but not observer-dependent) way. The indeterministic character of the universe-models is mirrored in a “temporal” theory of truth which rejects the principle of bivalence, and suitable semantics are provided for this theory. Finally, an account of physical law is given which defines it in terms of physical possibility, rather than vice versa.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 1976 , pp. 337 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

An earlier version of this paper was read at the annual meeting of the Canadian Philosophical Association in 1972. The author has benefitted greatly from discussion with Adolf Grünbaum, Nicholas Rescher, Nuel Belnap, Hector Castaneda, Rich Thomason, Jerry Massey, Paul Fitzgerald, Ferrei Christensen, Allen Janis, Jeffrey Winicour, and Don Maier.

References

REFERENCES

Borges, J. L. The Aleph and Other Stories, 1933–1969. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1970.Google Scholar
Cahn, S. Fate, Logic and Time. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
DeWitt, B. S. “Quantum Mechanics and Reality.” Physics Today 23 (1970): 30–35. Reprinted in [5].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, B. S. and Graham, N. (eds.). The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Earman, J. “Space-Time, or How to Solve Philosophical Problems and Dissolve Philosophical Riddles Without Really Trying.” The Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970): 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. S. Space, Time and Gravitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, P. “The Truth About Tomorrow's Sea-Fight.” The Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969): 307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. “The Anistropy of Time.” In The Nature of Time. Edited by Gold, . Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Pages 149–186.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. “The Meaning of Time.” In Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Time. Edited by Freeman, and Sellars, . Lasalle: Open Court, 1971. Pages 195–228.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Second edition, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. “On Determinism.” In Polish Logic 1920–1939. Edited by McCall, S. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. Pages 19–39.Google Scholar
McCall, S. “Temporal Flux.” American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1966): 270–281.Google Scholar
McCall, S. “Time and the Physical Modalities.” The Monist 53 (1969): 426–446. Reprinted in Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Time. Edited by Freeman and Sellars, LaSalle: Open Court, 1971. Pages 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, S. “The Cardinality of Possible Futures,” (abstract), The Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1970): 363.Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. “Time and Physical Geometry.” The Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967): 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. “Les Fondements Logiques de la Mécanique des Quanta.” Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 13 (1953).Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. The Primacy of Practice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1973.Google Scholar
Rietdijk, C. W. “A Rigorous Proof of Determinism Derived From the Special Theory of Relativity.” Philosophy of Science 33 (1966): 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1963.Google Scholar
Thomason, R. H. “Indeterminist Time and Truth-Value Gaps,” Theoria 36 (1970): 264–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, H. Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1963.Google Scholar