Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:25:36.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Riddle of Radical Translation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Geoffrey Hellman
Geoffrey Hellman*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents parts of a theory of radical translation with applications to the problem of construing reference. First, in sections 1 to 4 the general standpoint, inspired by Goodman's approach to induction, is set forth. Codification of sound translational practice replaces the aim of behavioral reduction of semantic notions. The need for a theory of translational projection (manual construction on the basis of a finite empirical correlation of sentences) is established by showing the anomalies otherwise resulting (e.g. from Quine's position). Then in section 5 a partial characterization of what constitutes an “admissible translation manual” is developed in the form of rules of translational projection governing correspondence of sentence-parts of a language-pair. Finally, in section 6, we give applications of the theory to the problem of construing reference. The general rules of section 5 suffice to rule out deviant referential schemes which have been held inscrutable alternatives to standard schemes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1974 , pp. 227 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J. (eds.). Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.Google Scholar
[2] Goodman, N. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969. Ch. II.Google Scholar
[3] Goodman, N. “On Likeness of Meaning.” Analysis I (1949): 6–7.Google Scholar
[4] Goodman, N. The Structure of Appearance. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.Google Scholar
[5] Harris, Z. Mathematical Structures of Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968.Google Scholar
[6] Hellman, G. “Steps in the Theory of Radical Translation.” (Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1972)Google Scholar
[7] Peirce, C. S. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. VI. Edited by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. Burks. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1931–1958.Google Scholar
[8] Quine, W. V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969. Chapter II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Quine, W. V. Word and Object. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, 1960. Chapter II.Google Scholar