Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:28:39.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Approach to Argument by Analogy: Extrapolation and Chain Graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Daniel Steel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay sketches an account of extrapolation in terms of analogical reasoning that generalizes the notion of comparative process tracing. The account offered here relies on something known as chain graphs, which are used to explicate the role of “fingerprints,” or distinctive markers, as a strategy for avoiding an underdetermination problem having to do with spurious analogies. Moreover, I show how the extrapolator's circle, one of the central challenges for extrapolation, is closely tied to distinctive markers and the Markov condition as it applies to chain graphs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 77 , Issue 5 , December 2010 , pp. 1058 - 1069
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank an anonymous referee, Francesco Guala, Wendy Parker, Marcel Weber, and participants in at the 2008 PSA symposium on Extrapolation and Public Policy for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

References

Barker, Philip, and Branch, Amos. 2008. “The Interaction of Modern Sunscreen Formulations with Surface Coatings.” Progress in Organic Coatings 62:313–20.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFollette, Hugh, and Shanks, Niall. 1996. Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Extrapolation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, Steffen, and Richardson, Thomas. 2002. “Chain Graph Models and Their Causal Interpretations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 64 (3): q321–61.10.1111/1467-9868.00340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar