Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T09:20:54.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement Without Archimedean Axioms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Louis Narens
Louis Narens*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Axiomatizations of measurement systems usually require an axiom—called an Archimedean axiom—that allows quantities to be compared. This type of axiom has a different form from the other measurement axioms, and cannot—except in the most trivial cases—be empirically verified. In this paper, representation theorems for extensive measurement structures without Archimedean axioms are given. Such structures are represented in measurement spaces that are generalizations of the real number system. Furthermore, a precise description of “Archimedean axioms” is given and it is shown that in all interesting cases “Archimedean axioms” are independent of other measurement axioms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1974 , pp. 374 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bell, J. L. and Slomson, S. B. Models and Ultraproducts. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1966.Google Scholar
[2] Helmholtz, H. Zählen und Messen Erkenntnis-Theoretisch Betrachet. Philosophische Aufsätze Eduard Zeller gewidmet. Leipzig, 1887. (English translation by C. L. Bryan, Counting and measuring. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1930.)Google Scholar
[3] Holder, O. “Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass.” Ber. Verh. Klg. Sächsis Ges. Wiss. Leipzig, Math.–Phys. Classe 53 (1901): 1–64.Google Scholar
[4] Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A. Foundations of Measurement. Vol. I. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[5] Luce, R. D. and Marley, A. A. J. “Extensive Measurement when Concatenation is Restricted and Maximal Elements may Exist.” in Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. Edited by Morgenbesser, S., Suppes, P., and White, M. G. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969. Pages 235–249.Google Scholar
[6] Narens, L. “Why Tall Pygamies are Short.” In Social Science Working Papers #13, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, November, 1972.Google Scholar
[7] Narens, L. “Field Embeddings of Generalized Metric Spaces.” in Victoria Symposium on Nonstandard Analysis. Edited by Hurd, A. and Loeb, P. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
[8] Narens, L. “Minimal Conditions for Additive Conjoint Measurement and Qualitative Probability.” (To appear in Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1974.)10.1016/0022-2496(74)90030-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Narens, L. “Utility-Uncertainty Trade-off Structures.” In Social Sciences Working Papers #59, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, August, 1974.Google Scholar
[10] Roberts, F. S. and Luce, R. D. “Axiomatic Thermodynamics and Extensive Measurement.” Synthese 18 (1968): 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Robinson, A. Introduction to Model Theory and the Metamathematics of Algebra. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1965.Google Scholar
[12] Robinson, A. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1966.Google Scholar
[13] Robinson, A. and Zakon, E. “Elementary Properties of Ordered Abelian Groups.” In Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 96 (1960): 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar